Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 3/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Intelligent (maybe), but far from perfect

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent (maybe), but far from perfect
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2918 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 62 of 91 (233711)
08-16-2005 2:34 PM 		Reply to: Message 6 by crashfrog
08-18-2003 1:38 PM

Not to mention the frailty of age. Perfectly consistent with evolution but makes no sense in a creationist framework.
​
Just be glad you don't live to be 900 like Noah and some of those other cats in the OT.
​
Back on topic: I can't remember the organism, (think it was an insect) where the female's abdomen basically explodes to release the eggs. - again, doesn't seem like a very clever design but definately something evolution would do.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by crashfrog, posted 08-18-2003 1:38 PM crashfrog has not replied
  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2918 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 63 of 91 (233716)
08-16-2005 2:43 PM 		Reply to: Message 56 by randman
08-15-2005 1:02 PM

Re: via deeper physics
randman writes:
​
... what we think of as physical reality consists first as a potential for form, QM, and takes on specific form subsequent to events. The earth in space-time is essentially a streak, not a ball, sort of like a large pole.
​
Imo, it is likely that pole can be affected and cause a vibration so that a different potential reality of it manifests, and thus past, present and future are all affected at once.
​
What is the meaning of this and what does it have to do with ID/perfection? I am not trying to be funny - I can't follow the argument here.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by randman, posted 08-15-2005 1:02 PM randman has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by randman, posted 08-16-2005 3:06 PM deerbreh has replied
  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2918 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 65 of 91 (233740)
08-16-2005 3:21 PM 		Reply to: Message 64 by randman
08-16-2005 3:06 PM

Re: via deeper physics
Sorry I asked. Look, I know what quantum mechanics is and I know about the wave and particle theory of light and General Relativity. But I don't see the connection to the topic; ID and "perfection". And I don't believe you have even started to make the connection. Until you can discuss this more coherently I don't think it has any place on any of the ID/special creation or evolution threads. Just my opinion, for what it is worth.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by randman, posted 08-16-2005 3:06 PM randman has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by randman, posted 08-16-2005 3:27 PM deerbreh has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024