5 online now:	AZPaul3, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), popoi, Tangle, Taq
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,810 Year: 4,067/9,624 Month: 938/974 Week: 265/286 Day: 26/46 Hour: 1/2

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Discovery Institute loses one

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Discovery Institute loses one

sidelined

Member (Idle past 5935 days)

Posts: 3435

From: Edmonton Alberta Canada

Joined: 08-30-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 4 of 103 (237396)
08-26-2005 2:40 PM

Reply to: Message 1 by PaulK
08-25-2005 2:52 AM

PaulK

I have fired off a letter to the Discovery Intitute asking for their take on the BobDavidson leaving issue. This is the second letter I have sent to the institute the last one was July 11 this year and no reply yet for that. If they should respond what do you suppose the official stance will be?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 1 by PaulK, posted 08-25-2005 2:52 AM		PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 5 by PaulK, posted 08-26-2005 2:54 PM		sidelined has not replied

sidelined

Member (Idle past 5935 days)

Posts: 3435

From: Edmonton Alberta Canada

Joined: 08-30-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 59 of 103 (237885)
08-28-2005 2:32 AM

Reply to: Message 58 by CK
08-27-2005 8:31 PM

Re: logical leap off the precipice, better start phlapping

Charles Knight

If we were to ask of each member on the list,

"Is either evolution or intelligent design a sound scientific theory? Why or why not?"

would this be neutral enough a question to elicit a reply that requires input from the respondent that needs a definite stance outlining their viewpoint or is there a better means of enquiring?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 58 by CK, posted 08-27-2005 8:31 PM		CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 61 by arachnophilia, posted 08-28-2005 4:04 AM		sidelined has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button