You mean the not-so-atheist who not-so-recanted his not-so-atheism in an interview that falsely claimed he had converted to Christianity? That guy?
No, the life-long atheist British philosopher who after carefully reviewing the evidence concluded an IDer must exist. Flew then became a deist.
Do you know what a deist is ?
You know, people on your side make him out to be some kind of atheist rock star, but I had never heard of the guy before the Christians lied about what he had done and said; and even by then he had become a deist, not an atheist.
Was this a late night post or are you convoluted naturally ?
IOW, just because YOU did not know who Flew was somehow negates the conversion ?
Flew was an atheist who became a deist. The only atheist rock star I know of is also the premier atheist evangelist - Richard Dawkins.
I don't give a fuck what the old fart says
Attempt to deflect away from evidence via reliance on an accepted negative cultural stereotype that octagenarians (old people) suddenly do not know what they are talking about when they disagree with you. IOW, ad hom postulated, caused by the inability to deal with the facts that effected the conversion.
You are a spoiled brat coddled by the Admins. Writing such a blatant ad hom insult justifies my observation.
I don't need someone else to tell me why I'm an atheist, and what someone else believes has no bearing on what conclusions I come to. I'm an atheist because that's the inescapable intellectual conclusion from the evidence, not because some limey geezer does or does not agree.
Atheism is not supported by any facts. It is a psychological state that has an almost incurable aversion to having a Boss. The intense desire caused by the psychosis provides the ends to justify the means.
Henry Herepton the Reptile
This message has been edited by Herepton, 09-18-2005 06:41 PM
™ Version 4.2