quote:
Careful with that one ausar, be advised that Behe's ID has been thuroughly debunked.
Well, I would like to read it myself because I've spent time reading many debunk articles about ID, but at the end, I haven't found them completely satisfactory. So I wish to read what Behe and Dembski have to say on the subject.
I think the essential flaw of ID would be that it tells little or nothing about the Designer, other then the fact that there is one. On the other hand, that can be a good thing too though.
I also would like to read this book:
http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=2061
Which presents both views from Ruse and Dembski at opposite ends coming toghether to edit this piece. Seems interesting.
This message has been edited by ausar_maat, 10-10-2005 09:59 PM