I dunno, it seems like your a little out of control in the fashion of your OP's. Maybe it's just me.
I think it's just you. I think it's a great OP, and it really gets right to the heart of the matter - why is it that, when the same act of "intelligence detection" ID proponents use to justify their ideas is applied to other fields, they dismiss it?
Another way to phrase the question: what basis is there for rejecting the "Bible Code" phenomenon as an intelligent signal that doesn't also apply to the detection of intelligent signals in biology?