Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,868 Year: 4,125/9,624 Month: 996/974 Week: 323/286 Day: 44/40 Hour: 3/7


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Design and the intelligence hypothesis

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Design and the intelligence hypothesis
Admin
Director
Posts: 13038
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 76 of 109 (231901)
08-10-2005 1:34 PM

My view is that the carbon atom as evidence of irreducible complexity is sillyness. I closed the other thread because it was only 8 shy of 300 with only this nonsense idea being discussed.
​
If EvoPeach would like to discuss his carbon atom idea further he must do so in it's own thread by a proposal to [forum=-25] that includes supporting citations from within the ID community to indicate that it's an idea they seriously entertain and not just EvoPeach's way of displaying his pique. Raising the idea again in any other venue will bring 24-hour suspensions for each incident.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13038
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 91 of 109 (232251)
08-11-2005 10:31 AM 		Reply to: Message 86 by Evopeach
08-11-2005 9:49 AM

Re: Followup despite Cnesorship
EvoPeach,
​
I assume you missed my Message 76. Please read it now.
​
Any further posts from you on the subject of carbon as an example of IR outside of [forum=-25] will bring a suspension. Please keep in mind that you need supporting citations from within the ID community.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Evopeach, posted 08-11-2005 9:49 AM Evopeach has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Evopeach, posted 08-11-2005 11:12 AM Admin has replied
  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13038
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 92 of 109 (232252)
08-11-2005 10:33 AM 		Reply to: Message 90 by nwr
08-11-2005 10:17 AM

Forum Guidelines Advisory
nwr writes:
​
Your posts in this topic are useless and vapid.. void of content. I shall not further respond, unless you come up with a better argument than you have already provided.
​
Please try to stay within the Forum Guidelines.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by nwr, posted 08-11-2005 10:17 AM nwr has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by nwr, posted 08-11-2005 11:26 AM Admin has not replied
  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13038
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 98 of 109 (232277)
08-11-2005 12:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 94 by Evopeach
08-11-2005 11:12 AM

Re: Followup despite Cnesorship
To everyone (even though I'm replying to EvoPeach),
​
EvoPeach's suspension is only for three days, and when he returns he's welcome to participate fully for as long as he follows the Forum Guidelines and moderator requests, just like everyone else.
​
Members who have issues with moderators or moderating procedures should take them to the General discussion of moderation procedures: The Sequel thread.
​
If EvoPeach is actually serious about carbon as an example of IR, he is welcome to propose the topic in the [forum=-25] forum as long as he includes some evidence that this is a position that ID proponents are actually promoting. It is my view that there is no merit to the position and that he merely introduced it into the Is ID Scientific? (was "Abusive Assumptions") thread in a fit of pique after his last suspension. He then proceded to fritter away the rest of that thread in a stream of unconstructive posts over a mere half day, then brought the same topic over to this thread to continue to do the same here. If this is actually a serious view within ID then EvoPeach needs to make that clear. EvC Forum will not be hosting nonsense discussions in the science forums.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Evopeach, posted 08-11-2005 11:12 AM Evopeach has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024