Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9173 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,577 Year: 4,834/9,624 Month: 182/427 Week: 95/85 Day: 0/2 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How Darwin caused atheism
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 122 (612428)
04-15-2011 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Tram law
04-15-2011 12:26 PM


Tram law writes:
Why wouldn't Evolution be concerned with the origin of life?
It seems to be it should be, because how can life evolve without the earliest life form?
How far back do we need to take this? Life cannot exist without metals. So why isn't evolution concerned with the creation of heavy nuclei? And don't we need a universe that is not opaque to light transmission? Why doesn't evolution cover that?
And the thing is, if evolution doesn't concern itself with that, it will simply give the fundies more cause to blast away at evolution.
You can find threads here where posters do exactly that. There is a huge thread here dealing with a poster who insists, with Byers-like adamancy, that abiogenesis and evolution must be one subject.
Let 'em blast.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Tram law, posted 04-15-2011 12:26 PM Tram law has not replied

  
Tram law
Member (Idle past 4783 days)
Posts: 283
From: Weed, California, USA
Joined: 08-15-2010


Message 122 of 122 (612435)
04-15-2011 3:13 PM


Sorry for the quick derail, back to the original topic.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024