Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,418 Year: 3,675/9,624 Month: 546/974 Week: 159/276 Day: 33/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   ID and the bias inherent in human nature
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 20 of 105 (203285)
04-28-2005 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Limbo
04-28-2005 8:42 AM


"Not even close". Really?
Yes, really.
If there is one then perhaps you could direct us all as to where to find it.
Where is the ID equivalent of Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species'? Is it Behe's 'Darwin's black box'? Is it Dembski's 'No Free Lunch'?
Where is the clearly articulated central basis for a science of ID. The Panda's Thumb cogently asks what happened to the coherent theory Dembski predicted would be forthcoming from Mike Gene when he received tenure.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Limbo, posted 04-28-2005 8:42 AM Limbo has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 23 of 105 (203289)
04-28-2005 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Limbo
04-28-2005 9:17 AM


Was that supposed to address my post number 20? If so it failed miserably.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Limbo, posted 04-28-2005 9:17 AM Limbo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Limbo, posted 04-28-2005 9:31 AM Wounded King has replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 26 of 105 (203294)
04-28-2005 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Limbo
04-28-2005 9:31 AM


So its not worth producing evidence to back up pretty much the most important claim in your argument? If ID does have a viable coherent theory then it would have much more weight and be given due consideration, . What an interesting approach to debate you do have.
TTFN,
WK
P.S. Is a streaming audio hosted on a conservative political website really the best forum to present groundbreaking theoretical scientific research?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Limbo, posted 04-28-2005 9:31 AM Limbo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by JonF, posted 04-28-2005 10:10 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 33 of 105 (203322)
04-28-2005 10:36 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Limbo
04-28-2005 10:22 AM


Having listened to, and watched, a turgid hour and a half of poorly presented regurgitated arguments with which I am already familiar. If this is your coherent centralising theory then you are really struggling.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Limbo, posted 04-28-2005 10:22 AM Limbo has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 38 of 105 (203334)
04-28-2005 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Limbo
04-28-2005 10:38 AM


Re: Forum Guidelines
People will do anything to preserve the bliss of their ignorance, eh?
Yes, they will do things like avoiding engaging in actual debate and providing substantive evidence for their claims.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Limbo, posted 04-28-2005 10:38 AM Limbo has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 72 of 105 (208986)
05-17-2005 8:52 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Limbo
05-17-2005 3:49 AM


Re: And now for something completely different
I cant really think of any that arent compatable, except atheism it seems.
Careful now, you'll have the Raelians and their clone army down on us if you aren't careful.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Limbo, posted 05-17-2005 3:49 AM Limbo has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 99 of 105 (209357)
05-18-2005 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Limbo
05-18-2005 4:04 AM


Discrediting ID
Not only that, but I have a suspition that somewhere there are scientists working over-time behind the scenes to completely discredit ID once and for all.
How can you discredit a 'God of the Gaps' style of argument. No matter how much we know there will always be gaps in our knowledge, just as every transitional fossil discovered simply means there are two new 'missing links'.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Limbo, posted 05-18-2005 4:04 AM Limbo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by EZscience, posted 05-18-2005 12:49 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024