Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9189 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Michaeladams
Post Volume: Total: 919,031 Year: 6,288/9,624 Month: 136/240 Week: 79/72 Day: 1/3 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What Properties Might Light of Millennia Past Have that Today's Doesn't?
Briterican
Member (Idle past 4145 days)
Posts: 340
Joined: 05-29-2008


Message 5 of 170 (601853)
01-24-2011 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Noitartst
01-24-2011 4:53 PM


Consider it refuted
Speed of Light
That refutes the entire notion that the speed of light is slowing, a creationist argument that is "based on gross misinterpretations of inaccurate data" (from the article linked).
As an interesting aside... "Setterfield's hypothesis was so lacking in plausibility that even the Institute for Creation Research rejected it. (Acts and Facts, June 1988, G. Aardsma)" (also from the linked article).
Thanks for the querying attitude, but I find it disconcerting that you are actively seeking evidence to refute current dating methods, before even trying to learn about those dating methods and how they have come about. This demonstrates that you've already made up your mind, and wish now to cherry pick from the existing pool of knowledge anything that might support your world view.
I'd encourage you to read the MANY fact laden posts in the "Dates and Dating" Science forum, which is not to be confused with the "Seeking a Date" forum to be found on another website.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Noitartst, posted 01-24-2011 4:53 PM Noitartst has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024