Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 77 (8973 total)
187 online now:
PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat) (2 members, 185 visitors)
Newest Member: Howyoudo
Post Volume: Total: 875,677 Year: 7,425/23,288 Month: 1,331/1,214 Week: 1/342 Day: 1/71 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3918
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 194 (601890)
01-24-2011 8:59 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

OK, let's give this one a go.

1) On CD's scale of things, this one seems pretty coherent.

2) This actually seems to be a fresh, not beaten to death topic.

Adminnemooseus

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add post-promotion comments.


  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3918
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 11 of 194 (601935)
01-25-2011 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Taz
01-25-2011 2:06 AM


I best I know, CrazyDiamond7 is not a YEC...
...and you seem to be dragging a YECism into the topic (red herring?).

I don't see a C. 4300 BC "great flood" as being relevant to this topic, and have declared your message to be "off-topic".

No replies to this message at this topic. If you feel you must, go to The Whine List topic.

Adminnemooseus


This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Taz, posted 01-25-2011 2:06 AM Taz has not yet responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3918
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 15 of 194 (602074)
01-25-2011 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Taz
01-25-2011 10:54 PM


Putting things into the OP, that are not in the OP
I think it is already well established (according to the OP at least) that scientists are dumbasses and that dating methods are wrong.

While message 1 is far from the desired clearly laid out topic starter we like to see, I don't see either YECim/floodism or the above quoted as being there stated. If you wish to argue this, please quote the relevant portion of message 1 and explain your perceptions of the quoted.

In general, you're presenting non-topic snark - The sort of thing for which I've several times suspended Dr. Adequate.

Adminnemooseus

Added by edit: My compliments to the content of message 13.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Taz, posted 01-25-2011 10:54 PM Taz has not yet responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3918
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 17 of 194 (602078)
01-26-2011 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Buzsaw
01-26-2011 12:36 AM


Re: Henry Morris On Global Population Problem
I really don't see CrazyDiamond7 having invoked any sort of C. 5000 years ago human population bottleneck. Thus I see anything "Great Flood" to be off-topic.

If you wish to discuss the worlds human population as having started from your post flood time and numbers, please propose a new topic.

Adminnemooseus


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Buzsaw, posted 01-26-2011 12:36 AM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020