Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
601 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, jar, Percy (Admin), Phat, Tanypteryx (6 members, 595 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,132 Year: 4,244/6,534 Month: 458/900 Week: 164/150 Day: 10/8 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3008 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 93 of 194 (604734)
02-14-2011 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Buzsaw
02-13-2011 11:47 PM


Re: Here is some evidence for you...
Hey Buzz,

None answered my other question.

Frankly, you would be incredibly lucky and skilled, as an Anthropologist, to find 'a lot' of human remains in the same strata. To find 'a lot' of human remains in the same strata all the way down to 200,000 years ago would be nothing short of miraculous. The fact is that fossilization is an iffy business, and even if a bone does become fossilized it can be unburied due to erosion and basically erode away. That and the fact that we have no way to view what fossils remain in the geology underneath our feet over a large area, helps to keep many fossils hidden. That isn't to say that we don't have evidence of human activities that don't include bones. These can and do include such activities as lithics, butchered bones (ex. marrow extraction, cut marks, pot rub, discoloration, etc.), cultural remains (ex. artwork, homes, fire pits, jewelry, artifacts, etc). If you allow for the full range of fossils and human cultural remains then the breadth of evidence showing Homo Sapiens has been around for more than 100k years is overwhelming.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Buzsaw, posted 02-13-2011 11:47 PM Buzsaw has seen this message

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022