Summations Only

Or maybe you're wrong You ever consider that as a possible answer?

You posit that evolution employs some kind of communication between parent and offspring while totally failing to consider that the majority of species have no means of this communication.The logical response to this is not "well maybe they do have the communications". The logical response is "oh yeah, it looks like I was wrong".

I would like you to say what you mean and mean what you say.Why hide God's Will behind esoteric language? Bzzzt. Common creationist misunderstanding of evolution...."Blind chance"The chance aspect of mutation is only part of the theory, the other part is the selection process that makes the whole thing no longer "blind".

Indeed. I don't think so. I didn't choose to believe in evolution. I was involuntarily convinced by the evidence. Actually, I wouldn't even say that I "believe in" evolution. It is simply a fact that I don't reject. And the Theory of Evolution is the best explanation of the fact that we see. That should be a red flag... that, one, you've had to choose this belief, and two, you have to make it more accepted to yourself. Just let the evidence speak for itself and stop making stuff up.Disregarding evidence and instead imagining things and going: "maybe this happened, maybe it was that way" isn't doing very much of anything. You'd be doing just as much wondering how The Force has guided evolution.

Oh, okay. That makes more sense.Your problem is that the point you're expanding to does not follow logically. It turns out that you're just plain wrong.Knowledge is not passed on through generations via DNA. Its impossible.

Well that's awefully presumptuous and pretentious of you I don't think anyone who's discussed with you in this thread unquestionably believes anything.And your "idea" is so bad that the people here have already invested more time in trying to help you than its worth.This whole "maybe I am right" stuff is bullshit. I mean, maybe the Flying Spagetti Monster is controlling evolution.But since we've recognized your idea as crap, you're sticking with it maybe being right but us just not wanting to consider it because we don't want to question current theory. Pah-lease

What is impossible is the knowledge being passed on via DNA.From your source:

quote:

---

Epigenetics adds a whole new layer to genes beyond the DNA.

---

From wiki:

quote:

---

In biology, and specifically genetics, epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in phenotype (appearance) or gene expression caused by mechanisms other than changes in the underlying DNA sequence,

---

Zi ko's harebrained idea is that it is passed on through the DNA and he is wrong.

Are you getting the same impression that he's really young? Like a teenager or something...

So then your non-theory really is worthless, isn't it?

A lucky guess with a ridiculous coincidence.

How pompous!You really do think that your speculations have some value and that the opposition to them is because of their nature That's hilarious!

You forgot to mention the conceit...

You mean how like there's some Natural Selection that weeds out different genomes that arrise through Random Mutations?By golly, I think you're on to something!