And namely the books i say that talk about typing randomly for along time are Richard Dawkins The Blind Watch Maker is one of them.
I think Dawkins was trying to make the point that natural selection is a non-random process by giving the shakespeare typing monkey analogy "new life". If I remember correctly he took that analogy and added a new rule: any letter that is "beneficial" the the shakespeare story (a letter that actually fits) stays there, and that way you can get the book in
much less time.
evolution claims the first primitive cell... if there are such things as "primitive" cells.
You didnt finish the sentence (I think). Anyway, evolution doesn't say whats "primitive" (the way your using it).
Never does he mention where the computer came from.
Irrelevant.
And why ever they say that natural selection seperates the good from the bad I don't know... in science you find the good stuff breaks down ever so quickly and the bad bits you can't get rid of.
I don't quite follow...can you give an example? (remember, we are talking about living things... you know, things that replicate)
The idea that different sexes arose by chance...
wrong.
...that by eating a few potatoes a woman can churn out a baby...
wrong.
...with all the info on how to do so on the size of a pin head. The sperm....
wrong.
...a brain that does a supreme diagnosis of whats wrong if you get a cut or something like that.
wrong.
Well anything that can't be repeated, is not science.
wrong.
I'm sorry... there is nothing I can say here. Please open a textbook. I know this forum is supposed to be educational, but there's a limit.
™ Version 4.2