quote:
It has everything to do with evolution as evolution is a theory and how life began and developed. evolution claims the first primitive cell... if there are such things as "primitive" cells. Anything that can extract energy from it's environment and then have the blueprint to replicate itself is not primitive. And won't arise by chance. you try it.
Thre are two major errors here. First, Evolution is not a theory of the origin of life. Secondly, evolutionary theory does not claim that the first life was anything as complex as a cell (let alone a modern cell). These evolved from far simpler predecessors.
quote:
And namely the books i say that talk about typing randomly for along time are Richard Dawkins The Blind Watch Maker is one of them. Never does he mention where the computer came from.
I very much doubt that that is true (looking up "typist" in the index comes up with an analogy dealing with the preservation of genes - and assumes intnetional copying, not random typing). The old "typing monkys" illustration comes up - but in the context of a discussion of
how much we can attribute to chance (and that deals with short phrases, not whole books !). In the course of that argument he states that he considers a random origin of DNA (and the associated "machinery" of replication) to be sufficiently unlikely that we should look for other explanations.
As for the last sentence I hope that I don't need to point out that metaphors, analogies and illustrations are NOT literally true.