|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Change In Egypt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
On the broader question, change in Egypt will clearly be a good thing, unless it's change for the worse, in which case it won't. Mubarak is clearly about to be forced from office, unless he isn't. Right, but the only thing outsiders should be concerned with is what is good for the Egyptian people, not OUR government. "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dronestar Member Posts: 1417 From: usa Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Taq writes: Our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are serving mainly as police. Taq writes: it is in our best interest to be the World Police because it allows us to shape world events in ways that benefit us. It seems you are confusing the term "police", usually reserved for people who's jobs are to uphold justice and peace, with "mafia hitmen". (Or you were being sarcastic. A winking smilicon would be helpful) Edited by dronester, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
Is it any wonder, then, why the other protests that are occurring (Tunisia comes to mind) are getting VERY little airplay?
"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10081 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
I realize that, effectively, we are. But for us to actually start seeing ourselves that way is seriously fucked. For us to think the entire rest of the world should be just like amurrica is a very self centered and egotistical....AMERICAN way of thinking.... If you define "just like amurrica" as a constitutionally bound democracy that allows for human rights with a 150 year record of stable government then yes, I think other countries would be happy to be "just like amurrica". History has shown that it is in our best interest for other countries to have stable democratic governments.
I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not..... Not sarcasm, just the truth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10081 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
It seems you are confusing the term "police", usually reserved for people who's jobs are to uphold justice and peace, with "mafia hitmen". So if our police go after drug kingpins and those looking to destabilize the government does that make our police into mafia hitmen?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sfs Member (Idle past 2561 days) Posts: 464 From: Cambridge, MA USA Joined: |
hooah212002 writes:
That seems like an excessive generalization. Why is it true? If we had a choice between an Egyptian government that was good for its own people and was also virulently anti-American, and one that was equally good for its own people but friendlier toward us, why shouldn't we be concerned about which was in power?
Right, but the only thing outsiders should be concerned with is what is good for the Egyptian people, not OUR government.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
If you define "just like amurrica" as a constitutionally bound democracy that allows for human rights with a 150 year record of stable government.. Then why the hell have we been tossing billions of dollars to Mubarak for 30 years?? You do know WHY the Egyptian people are protesting, right?
History has shown that it is in our best interest for other countries to have stable democratic governments. So you are all for shaping other people to suit YOUR interests? That's ok with you? How about what they want? How about what is best for the people of THAT country? How did that whole Iraqi thing work out? We invaded them to institute a democracy...right? "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dronestar Member Posts: 1417 From: usa Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Hoo writes: Is it any wonder, then, why the other protests that are occurring (Tunisia comes to mind) are getting VERY little airplay? I think your post might mean that: The US prefers the status quo and would rather not have Tunisia's success spread. The US doesn't want any example of a successfull revolt to inspire other nations to follow suit. This was the biggest concern of Vietnam falling to a nationalistic leadership. The US didn't want that successful example for other client states to emulate. That is the REAL domino effect the US feared. I can imagine how fearful the US is if democracy spreads to Saudi Arabia. Then the US couldn't support/bribe the dictators there anymore. Is this what you meant?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
If we had a choice between an Egyptian government that was good for its own people and was also virulently anti-American, and one that was equally good for its own people but friendlier toward us, why shouldn't we be concerned about which was in power? Why the dichotomy? "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dronestar Member Posts: 1417 From: usa Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Taq writes: So if our police go after drug kingpins and those looking to destabilize the government does that make our police into mafia hitmen? I am off-topic, but check into the US "support" of Columbia. (Another big violator-of-human-rights beneficiary of US aid, mostly military. Seems that every beneficiary of US military aid has a strong human rights violation history, don't it?). Edited by dronester, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
Not really. I meant that the only reason the US is concerned with Egypt so much is because of all the money they throw their way. I'm sure there are deeper reasons for that, but I'm not really caught up on all of it (isn't Egypt seen, by the US gov't, as some sort of ally in the Middle East: like a pawn of sorts?)
"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The Suez Canal is still a significant international asset.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dronestar Member Posts: 1417 From: usa Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Hoo writes: the only reason the US is concerned with Egypt so much is because of all the money they throw their way. Well, sure, but it's what the money buys . . .
Hoo writes: (isn't Egypt seen, by the US gov't, as some sort of ally in the Middle East: like a pawn of sorts?) Yep. Good job Hooah.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
History has shown that it is in our best interest for other countries to have stable democratic governments. Yet the American government routinely fights to make sure other countries do not have this 'stable democratic government'; ironically, it is in America's best interest to have a dictatorial puppet government. Stable governments are in the world's best interest; America doesn't care about the world. Jon Edited by Jon, : subtitle Check out No webpage found at provided URL: Apollo's Temple! Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
Well, sure, but it's what the money buys . . . "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024