Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9208 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,432 Year: 6,689/9,624 Month: 29/238 Week: 29/22 Day: 2/9 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Interrogation of an Apostle
swensenpower
Junior Member (Idle past 4567 days)
Posts: 13
Joined: 05-31-2012


Message 46 of 48 (664321)
05-31-2012 1:00 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Jon
02-10-2011 12:56 AM


Re: Applying the Art of Lie-detecting to the Resurrection Accounts
I believe that inconsistency between the gospels and even omissions support the validity of the witnesses. In court if four testimonies were exactly the same the judge would not allow them as evidence because they were most likely corroborated. The testimonies of the four gospels should have minor differences for the same reason that a college professor doesn’t get multiple identical essays unless some of the students have cheated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Jon, posted 02-10-2011 12:56 AM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by ringo, posted 06-02-2012 4:22 PM swensenpower has not replied
 Message 48 by PaulK, posted 06-02-2012 4:54 PM swensenpower has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 662 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 47 of 48 (664603)
06-02-2012 4:22 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by swensenpower
05-31-2012 1:00 AM


Re: Applying the Art of Lie-detecting to the Resurrection Accounts
swensenpower writes:
I believe that inconsistency between the gospels and even omissions support the validity of the witnesses.
Identical stories might suggest collusion but inconsistencies don't necessarily indicate accuracy. Where they disagree, how do you know which version (if any) is true?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by swensenpower, posted 05-31-2012 1:00 AM swensenpower has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17909
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 48 of 48 (664604)
06-02-2012 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by swensenpower
05-31-2012 1:00 AM


Re: Applying the Art of Lie-detecting to the Resurrection Accounts
We know of considerable copying in the Synoptic Gospels (usually held to be material copied from Mark in Matthew and Luke, and material from another, lost, source copied into both Matthew and Luke, although other scenarios are possible).
Any consideration of the differences between the Gospels needs to take this into account. The superficial approach if labelling the differences "minor" and simply asserting that they are evidence of accuracy is hopelessly inadequate, and ignores the reality of the texts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by swensenpower, posted 05-31-2012 1:00 AM swensenpower has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024