Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8972 total)
159 online now:
14174dm, PaulK, Tangle (3 members, 156 visitors)
Newest Member: Howyoudo
Post Volume: Total: 875,501 Year: 7,249/23,288 Month: 1,155/1,214 Week: 167/303 Day: 7/36 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The persistent question of evidence (RAZD and subbie only)
AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 613 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 6 of 42 (604400)
02-10-2011 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by RAZD
02-10-2011 9:24 PM


Hi RAZD,
did you mean to post that in this thread? It doesn't seem to be related to the OP. I'm not sure posting a response to criticism in another thread in a PNT will be viewed as entirely good form, especially a PNT that has stalled and is likely to not be promoted. Is there some good reason to be here? This PNT doesn't appear to be going to be promoted since it was for a GD where the other person declined.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 02-10-2011 9:24 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 02-10-2011 9:56 PM AdminModulous has responded

  
AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 613 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 8 of 42 (604402)
02-10-2011 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by RAZD
02-10-2011 9:56 PM


Re: just more definition of the basic argument.
Could you concisely sum up the basic argument this debate would be about?

Is it about who has the burden of the evidence under what circumstances in general. Is it about the specific question of god? Is it about the quality of the evidence or lack thereof it either way? Your extra definition was longer than your OP it would seem - and rather than being about whether you are required to provide evidence is about you not being persuaded by a certain argument.

Subbie expressed an interest in a debate with you where he would support ' the proposition that gods do not exist.' - so if that's the kind of thing you want to do here, and Subbie is still interested, you can have at it. Subbie, let us know.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 02-10-2011 9:56 PM RAZD has acknowledged this reply

  
AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 613 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 9 of 42 (604403)
02-11-2011 6:21 PM


subbie and RAZD only
subbie has confirmed his interest so I'm promoting this.

  
AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 613 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 10 of 42 (604405)
02-11-2011 6:25 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the The persistent question of evidence ... thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020