Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9179 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Happy Birthday: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,148 Year: 5,405/9,624 Month: 430/323 Week: 70/204 Day: 12/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The persistent question of evidence (RAZD and subbie only)
subbie
Member (Idle past 1364 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


(1)
Message 41 of 42 (609414)
03-19-2011 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by RAZD
03-13-2011 1:18 PM


Re: assumptions and logical arguments
Since you seemed to completely miss the point, I'll repeat it, and not mix it up with anything else.
You cannot conclude anything about how a created universe would operate without making assumptions about the creator, its methods or its purposes. Thus, it simply does not follow, without other ancillary assumptions, that
RAZD writes:
Whatever "laws\forces" exist within the created universe would be ones used ("put in place") by god/s for the created universe.
RAZD writes:
Are you saying that whatever is created just happens to operate by some previously existing external "natural laws\forces" that somehow exist now within the created universe and that the god/s would be\are absolutely powerless to control, change or modify them to make their creation function?
I'm not saying anything about what a creator might make or what it might be like, because I don't think it's possible to do that without assuming things about the creator.
You are making tacit assumptions about a created universe so that your conception of what a creator would produce is consistent with what we see. If you do not see the error in this process, it's beyond my ability to explain it to you.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by RAZD, posted 03-13-2011 1:18 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by RAZD, posted 05-13-2011 6:45 PM subbie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024