|
Author
|
Topic: God's Place In Evolution
|
frako
Member Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: 09-04-2010
|
|
Message 181 of 190 (607114)
03-02-2011 6:01 AM
|
Reply to: Message 176 by goldrush
03-01-2011 10:22 PM
|
|
Re: Accurate knowledge?
The scientists "decoded" the chromosome of an existing bacterial cell - using a computer to read each of the letters of genetic code. They copied this code and chemically constructed a new synthetic chromosome, piecing together blocks of DNA. The team inserted this chromosome into a bacterial cell which replicated itself. Synthetic bacteria might be used to make new fuels and drugs. Try reading the second part of this quote note the words "constructed a new synthetic chromosome" and yes in this case they did not use a purely man made cell tough we have been making those for 6 years.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 176 by goldrush, posted 03-01-2011 10:22 PM | | goldrush has replied |
|
goldrush
Member (Idle past 5069 days) Posts: 61 Joined: 02-08-2011
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 182 of 190 (607148)
03-02-2011 10:10 AM
|
Reply to: Message 180 by Coyote
03-02-2011 1:14 AM
|
|
Re: Catechism
No, it's logic. Whether one believes the Bible is inspired of God or not, the interpretation or meaning of the subjects in the writings is best ascertained by comparing scripture for scripture or the Bible to itself. Outside interpretation spoils it.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 180 by Coyote, posted 03-02-2011 1:14 AM | | Coyote has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 186 by Coyote, posted 03-02-2011 11:27 AM | | goldrush has not replied | | | Message 187 by ringo, posted 03-02-2011 11:31 AM | | goldrush has not replied | | | Message 188 by jar, posted 03-02-2011 4:41 PM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
goldrush
Member (Idle past 5069 days) Posts: 61 Joined: 02-08-2011
|
|
|
Message 183 of 190 (607150)
03-02-2011 10:15 AM
|
Reply to: Message 181 by frako
03-02-2011 6:01 AM
|
|
Re: Accurate knowledge?
Wait, are you saying we've been creating man made cells (from scratch) for 6 years? What do you mean? What is your source? I have heard nothing of the sort. Only endless debates of what pieces come first to form a cell from scratch.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 181 by frako, posted 03-02-2011 6:01 AM | | frako has replied |
|
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4439 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: 02-24-2011
|
|
|
Message 184 of 190 (607169)
03-02-2011 11:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 183 by goldrush
03-02-2011 10:15 AM
|
|
Re: Accurate knowledge?
goldrush writes: Wait, are you saying we've been creating man made cells (from scratch) for 6 years? What do you mean? What is your source? I have heard nothing of the sort. Only endless debates of what pieces come first to form a cell from scratch.
Go to Scientific American, search 'man made cell'. or google it and see what you find.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 183 by goldrush, posted 03-02-2011 10:15 AM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4439 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: 02-24-2011
|
|
|
Message 185 of 190 (607170)
03-02-2011 11:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 183 by goldrush
03-02-2011 10:15 AM
|
|
Re: Accurate knowledge?
goldrush writes: Wait, are you saying we've been creating man made cells (from scratch) for 6 years? What do you mean? What is your source? I have heard nothing of the sort. Only endless debates of what pieces come first to form a cell from scratch.
Go to Scientific American, search 'man made cell'. or google it and see what you find.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 183 by goldrush, posted 03-02-2011 10:15 AM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2400 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: 01-12-2008
|
|
|
Message 186 of 190 (607171)
03-02-2011 11:27 AM
|
Reply to: Message 182 by goldrush
03-02-2011 10:10 AM
|
|
Re: Catechism
No, it's logic. Whether one believes the Bible is inspired of God or not, the interpretation or meaning of the subjects in the writings is best ascertained by comparing scripture for scripture or the Bible to itself. Outside interpretation spoils it. Right, like talking snakes. pillars of salt, and global floods. Sure sounds like a bunch of tribal myths. Back to the topic?
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 182 by goldrush, posted 03-02-2011 10:10 AM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 706 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
|
|
Message 187 of 190 (607173)
03-02-2011 11:31 AM
|
Reply to: Message 182 by goldrush
03-02-2011 10:10 AM
|
|
Re: Catechism
goldrush writes: Whether one believes the Bible is inspired of God or not, the interpretation or meaning of the subjects in the writings is best ascertained by comparing scripture for scripture or the Bible to itself. Outside interpretation spoils it.
That isn't how we interpret any other book. We don't look for self-consistency in Treasure Island to determine Long John Silver's place in evolution.
You can have brevity and clarify, or you can have accuracy and detail, but you can't easily have both. --Percy
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 182 by goldrush, posted 03-02-2011 10:10 AM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 133 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 188 of 190 (607229)
03-02-2011 4:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 182 by goldrush
03-02-2011 10:10 AM
|
|
Re: Catechism
goldrush writes: No, it's logic. Whether one believes the Bible is inspired of God or not, the interpretation or meaning of the subjects in the writings is best ascertained by comparing scripture for scripture or the Bible to itself. Outside interpretation spoils it. That's a great con job used by the Christian Cult of Ignorance and actually might work if they ever honestly did the comparisons, but they don't.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 182 by goldrush, posted 03-02-2011 10:10 AM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
frako
Member Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: 09-04-2010
|
|
|
Message 189 of 190 (607232)
03-02-2011 4:47 PM
|
Reply to: Message 183 by goldrush
03-02-2011 10:15 AM
|
|
Re: Accurate knowledge?
what fearandloathing said, or you can look at the links and quotes i provided a while back tough you dont read my quotes so i doubt you look at the links.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 183 by goldrush, posted 03-02-2011 10:15 AM | | goldrush has not replied |
|
rukawaka 
Suspended Junior Member (Idle past 5015 days) Posts: 3 Joined: 04-24-2011
|
|
|
Message 190 of 190 (613397)
04-24-2011 11:31 PM
|
|
|
Obvious spam is obvious Edited by AdminSlev, : No reason given.
|
™ Version 4.2