Evolution guided by god? Or a natural process?

Well, I can think of "God is omnipotent, so he can guide evolution without anyone noticing".The problem with these arguments, as others have pointed out, is precisely that there is absolutely no evidence for them. So while they might be true, there's no way to tell.In fact, the same argument given above, can be used to say that the invisible pink unicorn is driving evolution, or the flying spaghetti monster, or whatever. And basically, so can any other argument you use.So, while there are arguments to use that god is guiding evolution, they're pretty much worthless, precisely because there is no evidence for them and they can be used for any imaginary deity.BTW, are you Dutch (or Belgian)?

---

I hunt for the truth

Now how did I guess that? Good, this is a very good place to learn about these things, and more. Ok, you could say that. However, I see a bit of an error in it .
You say "Too many accidents without guidance". The thing is, evolution IS guided, kinda. Natural selection ensures that all traits that are beneficial will be spread, while anything that is detrimental will die off fairly quickly. So, only the good traits survive making all the "accidents" irrelevant. I've got a counter question to that one: "If one only accepts evidence, does one even have a belief?". Would you mind telling of some, yes it will be off-topic, but a few posts won't matter, I guess. And I wouldn't want you to put false information in your report. I'm guessing it's for your school? Better have accurate information in it then. While the arguments might still be valid as of yet, it is essentially playing the god of the gaps argument, and that hasn't worked very well in the past. The problem you run into here (the most obvious one to me at least) is that you can NEVER show it has to be YOUR god that is doing the guiding. It could just as easily be another one. Well, unless the people you are holding it for are already convinced god exists, it might be a bit hard to persuade them it is indeed your god that is doing it all. An example. Do you think that if you told Muslims that it was indeed the Christian god (I'm assuming you are a Christian) that was guiding evolution, do you think they would accept it? Or try it the other way around, if a Muslim told you it was Allah guiding it, would you accept it?My point here? That one needs a predisposition of already believing in the particular god that the case is being made for to accept it is indeed that god that is guiding it all. Sounds interesting, from what I've seen of him, he knows a lot about all this stuff. However, I don't think he can give you any tips on how to convince people that god is behind evolution (I could be wrong though, I don't know him personally) since, from what I've seen, his position is something like: "I simply believe god is behind it, because I don't see any other way it could be". Which is fine, but I don't think you're going to convince anyone that doesn't already believe in your god that that is indeed what is happening.Long story short: If one doesn't believe in a particular god, one is not easily convinced it is that god that is behind anything at all.Oh, and Fosdick, I think Inge is a she, not a him. (going by the name here, correct me if I'm wrong)

---

I hunt for the truth