Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-20-2019 1:01 AM
22 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, PaulK, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (4 members, 18 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 857,116 Year: 12,152/19,786 Month: 1,933/2,641 Week: 442/708 Day: 1/135 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   All Human Beings Are Descendants of Adam
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2386 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 30 of 118 (606525)
02-26-2011 1:31 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by NoNukes
02-25-2011 10:44 PM


Except that mitochondrial eve lived at least 70000 years before the so called biblical eve would have lived.

From the Ancestor's Tale:

And indeed, today's best 'molecular clock' estimates for their respective dates are about 140,000 years ago for [mito]Eve and about 60,000 for [y-chrome]Adam.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by NoNukes, posted 02-25-2011 10:44 PM NoNukes has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by NoNukes, posted 02-28-2011 10:09 AM bluescat48 has responded
 Message 43 by Dr Jack, posted 02-28-2011 10:26 AM bluescat48 has acknowledged this reply

    
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2386 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 52 of 118 (606810)
02-28-2011 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by NoNukes
02-28-2011 10:09 AM


NoNukes writes:

bluescat48 writes:

Except that mitochondrial eve lived at least 70000 years before the so called biblical eve would have lived.


That's based on dates according to some hyper literal of Genesis. Surely that is not what this thread is about.

The point would be the same if y-Chromosome Adam was used.
It predates the Biblical Adam by thousands of years.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by NoNukes, posted 02-28-2011 10:09 AM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Europa, posted 02-28-2011 12:48 PM bluescat48 has responded

    
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2386 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 57 of 118 (606864)
02-28-2011 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Europa
02-28-2011 12:48 PM


This thread is about a statement. And whther it, as a statement, is true of false.

Fine if the y-Chromosome Adam, true, if Biblical Adam, false.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Europa, posted 02-28-2011 12:48 PM Europa has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019