Is the evolution of modern man going to stop

Sorry, guy. What you think the collective conscious is has nothing to do with Jung, Freud or evolution.You are talking about a new wave, metaphysical deviation from what Jung was talking about. It is based on what people who did not understand Jung's concept wanted it to mean rather than what he actually meant.Jung also never said that collective harmony was an archetype or that it is "all too under expressed."I doubt you know much of this subject at all.

Yeah, I am sure you have no idea of what Jung or Freud taught."Subconcious"?The word is "Unconscious."and there is no 7 Freudian sources of decision making.That is something you made up because you are a numerologist focused on the number 7.Instead of inventing things and attributing them to wrongful sources that have nothing to do with your perceptions, from now on be up front and tell us that these are your ideas.See, guy, there is a thing called the "internet" that has a sort of engine called "google" that people can utilize to "research" and "fact-check."There is nothing you can introduce here and claim that it came from Freud or Jung, or Dr. Phil or the Quran or anywhere else if it in truth did not originate with them without being completely pulverized.If you have something to offer, you do yourself no good service by introducing yourself as a liar, because the good will be tossed out with the bad if you give us constant reason to mistrust you.Try again. And this time, leave Freud and Jung out of it.

And my name is not Dave, so please quit addressing me as such.

I know what Jung said, which makes no reference to a world or shared universal consciousness.And don't give me a reference to preconsciousness now. It's too late.You were talking about the unconcious mind which you wrongly called "subconscious."Any person worth discussing Freudian precepts with will know that, of all words, subconsious is the most improper being how much Freud despised it.You clearly are not well-versed in these subjects.

Your point was to make up things and to falsely attribute them to Freud and Jung and to skew the meassage and meaning of their work, just as you are doing with "Subliminal."You should read the book before you decide whether or not it supports what you are saying.

Please give the evidence that you claim I deny and we will see if has any bearing on your proposal of a collective unconscious.

I anxiously await you to present an exerpt from the book which supports what you have claimed it says.Think I'll head to bed since this is never going to happen.

I didn't ask for a synopsis. I asked for an exerpt that would support your claims. I know the content of the book. Start a thread on this subject and I'll hand your ass to you on it.That's a promise.