Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Behe's Irreducible Complexity Is Refuted
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 16 of 223 (85387)
02-11-2004 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Silent H
02-10-2004 9:00 PM


quote:
All Behe must do is appeal to the Wellsian argument that there is no way to know that any of those species were related and that those bones had those functions.
My guess is that Behe very much would accept the relatedness of those species. My understanding is that he is very much in the evolution camp, with the exception of his "intelligent design" quirk.
Miller cites another of his Behe encounters in "Finding Darwins's God". I don't recall the exact context, but Miller brought up the common ancestor of man and the great apes. Behe apparently surprised Miller, by promptly conceding that the common ancestor concept was acceptable to him.
Behe, even in his own mind, has very little real arguement against evolution.
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Silent H, posted 02-10-2004 9:00 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Silent H, posted 02-11-2004 3:08 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024