Pharyngula has a piece on how teh interwebs might add a new dimension to science writing. Being an armchair scientist, I'm not sure I fully understand all the implications, and I don't get the impression that this means by-passing the peer review process, but I'd be curious to hear thoughts about how much this might change things.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
™ Version 4.2
