When I use the words "
intracately complex design" in reference to the "
macro universe and the
micro structure of things, many here do not seem to know what this means.
A single
atom with
electrons,
protons,
neutrons,
bosons,
leptons,
quarks,
gravitons, etc. is an intracately complex structure that most reasonable people should say could not have happened without design.
Wow! Two sentences with 12 scientific sounding words - it must be true!
Except that you refuse to define what
intricately complex is and can't suggest how we can test that all those 'ons' could not have happened without design, however that happened. The only argument you have made is that "most
reasonable people" would understand. And then you ask us to believe that you have more than an emotional commitment?
This is not the first time I've said this, it almost certainly won't be the last:
If you want to be treated like a science, play by the rules of science, not just the language. If not then stop whining if we treat ID as something driven by belief.
™ Version 4.2