Intelligent Design explains many follies

The theory of nuclear decay is only a theory and thus not science by your terms. Further, it is based on events in the past that noone has been there to witness, let alone measure. In neither your's nor any other scenario has any human been around long enough to "prove" nuclear decay rates of Uranium. By your argument nothing you do at work has any basis in science and is little more than voodoo. Are you willing to accept this or do you find fault with my logic?