Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Monetary Tsunami In America!!
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 76 of 121 (611016)
04-04-2011 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by crashfrog
04-04-2011 6:59 PM


crashfrog writes:
What would be wrong with enforcing our immigration laws.
Besides the fact that they're unfair, racist, deeply punitive, counterproductive, and meant to stop a "problem" that doesn't exist (supposed economic "losses" from low-skill immigration)?
Please explain??
I am totally open to changing my mind, I used to vote republican, til I was a hair from needing welfare. I used to belive in God, til I wised up. I am not looking to argue, only to learn. I will be the first to tell you I am wrong. I think all men have right to try to improve their lives, within the law. I guess I want to know where these laws are flawed?
Would a better guest worker program help?

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 6:59 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 7:46 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 77 of 121 (611019)
04-04-2011 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by crashfrog
04-04-2011 6:59 PM


One Example: Grocery Stores
crashfrog writes:
What would be wrong with enforcing our immigration laws.
Besides the fact that they're unfair, racist, deeply punitive, counterproductive, and meant to stop a "problem" that doesn't exist (supposed economic "losses" from low-skill immigration)?
Right now, our union is the only thing keeping the corporation from hiring illegals to stock the shelves at night. Were they allowed to do so, it would lower the wage of every one of us through attrition, as we would compete with each other for the limited hours left available. A lower middle class American can barely feed a family of four on twenty five thousand a year, but the new wage would be $12,500.00 a year...half as much as before. Whom does this demand help? Corporate stockholders and to a limited degree consumers.(though prices would not go much lower) Whom does it hurt? 14,000 lower middle class workers displaced into a hostile economy and likely forced to go on government assistance.
Edited by Phat, : fixed mistakes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 6:59 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by jar, posted 04-04-2011 7:42 PM Phat has replied
 Message 83 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 7:59 PM Phat has replied
 Message 90 by Jon, posted 04-04-2011 8:56 PM Phat has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 78 of 121 (611020)
04-04-2011 7:42 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Phat
04-04-2011 7:40 PM


Re: One Example: Grocery Stores
Phat writes:
crashfrog writes:
What would be wrong with enforcing our immigration laws.
Besides the fact that they're unfair, racist, deeply punitive, counterproductive, and meant to stop a "problem" that doesn't exist (supposed economic "losses" from low-skill immigration)?
Right now, our union is the only thing keeping the corporation from hiring illegals to stock the shelves at night. Were they allowed to do so, it would lower the wage of every one of us through attrition, as we would compete with each other for the limited hours left available. A lower middle class American can barely feed a family of four on twenty five thousand a year, but the new wage would be $12,500.00 a year...half as much as before. Whom does this demand help? Corporate stockholders and to a limited degree consumers.(though prices would not go much lower) Whom does it hurt? $14,000 middle class citizens displaced into a hostile economy and likely forced to go on government assistance.
I'm sorry but do you have any support for that assertion?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Phat, posted 04-04-2011 7:40 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 04-04-2011 7:44 PM jar has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 79 of 121 (611021)
04-04-2011 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by jar
04-04-2011 7:42 PM


Re: One Example: Grocery Stores
Yes. Right now, our contract covers every area in the store except floor maintenance, and floor maintenance is essentially 100% non English speaking immigrants. Our manager is so cheap, however, he even let one of them go and now makes us empty the trash in addition to our regular duties. (Which I dont complain about. )
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by jar, posted 04-04-2011 7:42 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by jar, posted 04-04-2011 7:47 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 86 by Theodoric, posted 04-04-2011 8:22 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 91 by ringo, posted 04-04-2011 9:15 PM Phat has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 80 of 121 (611022)
04-04-2011 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by fearandloathing
04-04-2011 7:31 PM


Please explain??
It's racist to treat Hispanic immigrants from Mexico differently under the law from white immigrants from Spain, but that's exactly what we do. It's unfair that it takes more than 30 years for a Mexican laborer to be approved for legal immigration, but a European professor can do it in about six months. It's deeply punitive in that we regularly place immigrants into a legal limbo of incarceration without sentence, legal representation, or trial. And the "problem" of economic losses and downward wage pressure immigrants supposedly cause doesn't exist; economists universally agree that low-skill immigration produces economic gains for domestic residents. But for some reason, the popular and racist consensus against Hispanic immigration from Mexico remains.
Would a better guest worker program help?
What would help is rethinking the notion that we need to keep out people who want to move here and do useful work, while American cities like Detroit are abandoning entire areas of the city due to depopulation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by fearandloathing, posted 04-04-2011 7:31 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 81 of 121 (611023)
04-04-2011 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Phat
04-04-2011 7:44 PM


Re: One Example: Grocery Stores
Phat writes:
Yes. Right now, our contract covers every area in the store except floor maintenance, and floor maintenance is essentially 100% non English speaking immigrants. Our manager is so cheap, however, he even let one of them go and now makes us empty the trash in addition to our regular duties. (Which I dont complain about. )
That still offers no support for your assertions.
You present no evidence that they are illegal.
They do not effect your jobs.
No one is competing for those jobs.
In other words, not one of your assertions is supported.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 04-04-2011 7:44 PM Phat has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 82 of 121 (611026)
04-04-2011 7:54 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by crashfrog
04-04-2011 6:59 PM


crashfrog writes:
beides the fact that they're unfair, racist, deeply punitive, counterproductive, and meant to stop a "problem" that doesn't exist (supposed economic "losses" from low-skill immigration)?
By the way, my trade is not considered un-skilled or low -skilled. I doubt very few of you know as much about plumbing as my helper does.
Sorry I know this is off topic response, but I get sick of people thinking that construction jobs are simple low skill jobs.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 6:59 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 8:02 PM fearandloathing has not replied
 Message 85 by Rahvin, posted 04-04-2011 8:16 PM fearandloathing has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 83 of 121 (611027)
04-04-2011 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Phat
04-04-2011 7:40 PM


Re: One Example: Grocery Stores
A lower middle class American can barely feed a family of four on twenty five thousand a year, but the new wage would be $12,500.00 a year...half as much as before.
Why? Immigrants can't live in Mexico and work in Denver, Phat. They have the same costs of living you do because they have to live where you live. They're no more inclined to accept a less-than-livable wage than you are, because they're paying the same bills.
If there weren't ill-considered and racist laws against their right to work, they wouldn't have to be paid under the table, which is the sole advantage to employers - being able to evade payment of payroll taxes, unemployment insurance, and health care costs. They could join your union. They could pay taxes in your district.
Whom does this demand help?
You.
14,000 lower middle class workers displaced into a hostile economy and likely forced to go on government assistance.
Illegal immigrants can't go on public assistance due to not having a US tax identity. Since they can take only limited advantage of public services, but contribute to the tax base via sales taxes and other revenue streams, they're clearly giving more than they get. Immigration is and always has been a positive force, economically.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Phat, posted 04-04-2011 7:40 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Phat, posted 04-05-2011 3:51 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 84 of 121 (611030)
04-04-2011 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by fearandloathing
04-04-2011 7:54 PM


By the way, my trade is not considered un-skilled or low -skilled. I doubt very few of you know as much about plumbing as my helper does.
I'm sorry, I don't think of plumbing as a low-skill profession, certainly. I assumed we were talking about low-skill immigration because that's usually what people are talking about when they're concerned about the effects of Hispanic immigration from Mexico.
The guys coming over who actually are plumbers are even more beneficial for everyone, including you. We all benefit from skilled immigration, despite the nearly universal popular consensus that immigration is bad for everyone. It's really amazing how people get that completely wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by fearandloathing, posted 04-04-2011 7:54 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4039
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.2


Message 85 of 121 (611033)
04-04-2011 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by fearandloathing
04-04-2011 7:54 PM


By the way, my trade is not considered un-skilled or low -skilled. I doubt very few of you know as much about plumbing as my helper does.
Sorry I know this is off topic response, but I get sick of people thinking that construction jobs are simple low skill jobs.
Construction is a wide-ranging field. Plumbers, crane operators, electricians, and other skilled labor all fall under the "construction" label, and so can unskilled basic laborers.
But it's still a myth that illegal immigration somehow costs American jobs. It's just not true. At all. Illegal immigrants don't come to take jobs from already-employed Americans. Illegal immigrants come to fill open positions. They'll continue to come as long as there is work available. When new housing construction basically stopped in 2008, illegal immigrants started leaving the US in droves, and it's continued as other market sectors have been affected.
US immigration laws fight a problem that does not exist. The only reason to get so riled up about illegal immigration is that you don;t want more brown people moving in. They don;t lower your wages. They don;t take your jobs. They use the ER, but on average you probably do too because you can't or won't spend the money for a normal doctor's visit. They pay taxes, frequently even income tax. They don't use social safety net programs like welfare or food stamps. They earn money and spend money, helping to drive the American economy.
The problems with illegal immigration stem primarily from designating them as illegal in teh first place. Give them full legal rights like you and me, and they won;t be taken advantage of by employers because they won;t be able to be threatened with deportation. Give them social security numbers and they'll pay income taxes (and many of them already do using stolen identifications) in addition to the sales and other taxes they already pay anyway. Give them access to normal healthcare (hell, give it to the rest of us, too) and they won't go to the ER all the time. Give them drivers licenses and they can get car insurance.
Give them legal identification paperwork at no charge when entering the US so that they can enjoy the rights we all do, and you won;t have a few million anonymous and un-tracked people hiding out and being exploited in the US.
And the ones who still try to hide will obviously be people like drug runners (we can talk about the absurdity of the War on Drugs in another thread) and terrorists, who right now can sneak in pretty easily.
Do you see where I'm going here? We spend disgusting amounts of time, money, and political hot air whining and bitching about illegal immigration, and we're causing the problem, not them. Yes, they're breaking the law. Yes, that's bad - but the law is counterproductive, too. It doesn't excuse willingness to break the law, but neither is there any real justification for current US immigration policy. It's all just a bunch of stupid racism and scapegoating.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by fearandloathing, posted 04-04-2011 7:54 PM fearandloathing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by fearandloathing, posted 04-04-2011 8:30 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9142
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 86 of 121 (611034)
04-04-2011 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Phat
04-04-2011 7:44 PM


Re: One Example: Grocery Stores
and floor maintenance is essentially 100% non English speaking immigrants.
That does not make them illegal. Also, non-english speaking does not even make them immigrants.
You do realize that SW USA was populated by spanish speakers long before the USA even existed. There are many native born US Citizens for whom english is a second language. My father is one of those. Puerto Ricans have been US citizens since 1917. My Spanish speaking ancestors were US citizens further back than most of my ancestors on the english speaking side. Most of my mothers family came from Canada in the 1920's and 1930's.
Racism is a very ugly thing.
Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 04-04-2011 7:44 PM Phat has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 87 of 121 (611036)
04-04-2011 8:30 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Rahvin
04-04-2011 8:16 PM


Thank you and frog for explaining your position, and for most part I agree.
I mentioned a better guest worker program and I think the "illegal" immigrant status is something that needs to be addressed, for the benefit of all. If there was no market for people who felt they had to work cheap then we all would benefit. Am I wrong?

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Rahvin, posted 04-04-2011 8:16 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by jar, posted 04-04-2011 8:36 PM fearandloathing has not replied
 Message 89 by crashfrog, posted 04-04-2011 8:44 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 88 of 121 (611037)
04-04-2011 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by fearandloathing
04-04-2011 8:30 PM


fearandloathing writes:
Thank you and frog for explaining your position, and for most part I agree.
I mentioned a better guest worker program and I think the "illegal" immigrant status is something that needs to be addressed, for the benefit of all. If there was no market for people who felt they had to work cheap then we all would benefit. Am I wrong?
And it could be addressed easily and quickly by removing the exempted industries from the minimum wage laws, and by setting minimum wages as a percentage of the poverty level instead of a specific dollar amount.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by fearandloathing, posted 04-04-2011 8:30 PM fearandloathing has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by xongsmith, posted 04-05-2011 2:22 PM jar has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 89 of 121 (611039)
04-04-2011 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by fearandloathing
04-04-2011 8:30 PM


If there was no market for people who felt they had to work cheap then we all would benefit. Am I wrong?
There's always a market for cheap labor; what depresses wages is when workers exist in a legal gray area (or dark area, for that matter.) If Hispanic immigrants from Mexico weren't forced by punitive immigration law to conceal their activities from the law, they wouldn't be exploited by unscrupulous employers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by fearandloathing, posted 04-04-2011 8:30 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 121 (611040)
04-04-2011 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Phat
04-04-2011 7:40 PM


Re: One Example: Grocery Stores
Right now, our union is the only thing keeping the corporation from hiring illegals to stock the shelves at night.
What utter nonsense. All the retailers around here, as far as I know, hire only legal workersincluding the night-stock crew.
Why? Night-stock is usually a well-paid position.

Check out No webpage found at provided URL: Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Phat, posted 04-04-2011 7:40 PM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024