Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lack of Defining Features of Intelligent Design
PeterMc
Junior Member (Idle past 6091 days)
Posts: 25
From: New Zealand
Joined: 06-21-2007


Message 8 of 41 (409512)
07-09-2007 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by RAZD
06-09-2007 3:42 PM


Re: The Lessons of History
I agree. I think the lack of "features" in ID are starting to annoy the YEC's. It's neither gutsy science nor solidly faith based. Behe is limiting it's scope down to a god of the very small gaps. Demski is evasive about how any of his theorising could be applied to anything observable in nature. None of them have any comments about how ID can provide better explanations for existing evolutionary data. So, yes it is lacking features. It doesn't give a worthy opponent enough to grab and swing by the tail. To quote someone (in a similar but unrelated context- ref. someone?)"Its not even wrong".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 06-09-2007 3:42 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024