Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Direct and indirect evidence in science
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 41 (614044)
04-30-2011 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Medis
04-30-2011 10:58 AM


Ain't Evidence Just Evidence?
Hi, couldn't find a place to post these questions so decided to try and start a new topic:
What is the definition of direct evidence and indirect evidence and could you please provide examples of each? In relation to evolution, would the fossil record be an example of direct or indirect evidence of evolution?
Also, could you explain why indirect evidence is "good enough" evidence to support scientific theories, or provide examples of commonly accepted scientific theories, where supporting evidence is wholely, or mostly indirect? I know atoms are at least one such theory (source: Questions and Answers - What is one example of indirect evidence that scientists use to study an atom?)
Currently debating a creationist and he's been nagging me about evolution only being supported by indirect evidence while every other scientific theory is apparently supported by direct evidence...didn't want to state any falsehoods which is why I'm asking
I've always been under the impression that evidence is just evidence. It's only measure of quality is in how well it supports the conclusion(s) being drawn from it.
Jon

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Medis, posted 04-30-2011 10:58 AM Medis has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024