|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Existence | |||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Being finite human beings everything we know of happening in our lifetime has a cause and effect. So the default position is that everything has a cause.
Non-sequitur. How does the first statement have anything to do with your conclusion?
Nothing is wrong with a universe existing where things can happen without a cause. But the one we live in has a cause and effect for everything. Please show your evidence.
Thus either existence has always existed, which is a scientific impossibility, according to present theory.
Please explain this present theory. Isn't it funny how you dismiss scientific evidence, but will rely on a theory if you feel it has anything to do with your argument. Isn't that a bit disingenuous? Nay, hypocritical? Maybe if you could define existence there could at least be some sort of conversation here. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
I will quote Stephen Hawking. That quote deals with time and the universe. So are you saying existence=universe?
Theodoric writes: Maybe if you could define existence there could at least be some sort of conversation here. From the OP:
quote: It would have helped if you had read the OP. God Bless, It would have helped if you had actually read my post. Not assume you know what I am saying.
Theodoric writes: Maybe if you could define existence What does this actually mean to you? Does existence have some sort of metaphysical meaning to you? May Brighid bless you Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
I'm saying the universe has not always existed, but the universe does exist now. Existence does not = the universe. Then the Hawking quote does not support your argument. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Just because the word exist is in the quote, does not mean it supports you.
I asked if you thought universe=existence. You said no. Hawking is talking about the universe not existence. Show me how he is talking about existence. Again, until you can define existence(without using the word exist) nothing you really say is saying anything. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
I at no point put forth that Hawking was equating the two nor that he was talking about existence.
Bullshit. Now you resort to lying? Lets follow the conversation, shall we?
ICANT writes:
Please explain this present theory. Isn't it funny how you dismiss scientific evidence, but will rely on a theory if you feel it has anything to do with your argument. Isn't that a bit disingenuous? Nay, hypocritical? Thus either existence has always existed, which is a scientific impossibility, according to present theory. So you see you are talking about existence. So I asked for the theory, for which you responded with the Hawking quote. Here is your response
Theodoric writes: Please explain this present theory. I will quote Stephen Hawking.
quote:Source The standard theory says the universe has not always existed but had a beginning in the past. So yes you did equate the two. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
This reply makes it very clear that you don't even know what you are saying. You have no grasp of the scientific concepts.
You don't know if you think the universe equates existence or does not equate existence. You are incapable of even explaining to us what you truly mean by existence. So have fun. I knew trying to debate you was useless, you will always refuse to put aside your preconceived ideas in order to gain an iota of knowledge. Oh, since you have decided Hawking is the penultimate authority on this subject, you agree with him on everything on this subject. I guess your bullshit theory is no longer tenable even in your eyes? Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
The universe has always existed in some form.
I though Hawking said it had a beginning? So now the quote doesn't support your argument? Could you make up your mind one way or the other? Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Wow!! Resorting to personal attack? I am hurt, stung, destroyed.
Why don't you reread your posts, figure out what your actual argument is, remove the contradictions and inconsistencies and try again. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
So if someone is of the opinion that the Universe appeared out of a turtles rectum last Wednesday you would expect the people on this forum to present the mechanism for it?
Do you realize how ridiculous your comment sounds? Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
The universe does not count time it just exists.
So everything is actually happening simultaneously? Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
For those who are fascinated by relativity denial, Conservapedia has an article full of such rantings. The author seems to think relativity is some kind of liberal plot.
Conservapedia is truly nutball central. They truly want the USA to become a third world nation. These people want the world to become a feudal theocracy. The funny thing is that they all beleive that they are going to be on the top. The don't realize that if it happened they would probably be one of the lowly serfs, just like 99% of the population. Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Do you think these two things are equal?
Magnetic field Gravitation Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Well, the obvious is that you are ignoring Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction. Was this deliberate?
Now that's just cruel.Funny, but cruel. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024