Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9077 total)
754 online now:
Tanypteryx (1 member, 753 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,085 Year: 5,197/6,534 Month: 40/577 Week: 28/80 Day: 15/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Doesn't Natural Selection lead to Specified Complexity?
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 1769 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 109 of 138 (619802)
06-12-2011 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by SavageD
06-12-2011 1:01 PM


Re: A call for clarity
Plants are found within the natural environment therefore, by all means plants are natural in that sense. Though some of the materials (dna for example) of which they are comprised of, are by all means unique to the environment.

You seem to have an unusual idea of what the term "unique" means.

DNA certainly isn't unique. DNA is abundant.
A specific sequence MAY be unique, but then so too would the "plant" which contains it.

However, since we don't address each dandelion as a "unique" kind of plant, it seems a little ridiculous to have such a double standard.

I suppose you could say that DNA/RNA/mDNA was unique _IF_ you had a host of other life forms which didn't utilize any of these sequences. THEN, you could say "Look, life on Earth is 'unique' since all other life is silicon based" or whatever.

But that would assume having discovered other life.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by SavageD, posted 06-12-2011 1:01 PM SavageD has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022