Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,788 Year: 4,045/9,624 Month: 916/974 Week: 243/286 Day: 4/46 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Support for Louisiana repeal effort
menes777
Member (Idle past 4345 days)
Posts: 36
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Joined: 01-25-2010


Message 11 of 108 (614975)
05-09-2011 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Tram law
05-09-2011 1:20 PM


So in other words...
You have got no real rebuttal?
If you don't want certain people to reply to your post you shouldn't be on a forum. If you don't want to answer someone just ignore their post, but your post just seems to say you don't any real rebuttal to his replies.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message by continuing in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Tram law, posted 05-09-2011 1:20 PM Tram law has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Tram law, posted 05-09-2011 1:41 PM menes777 has not replied

  
menes777
Member (Idle past 4345 days)
Posts: 36
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Joined: 01-25-2010


Message 53 of 108 (615240)
05-11-2011 4:51 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Tram law
05-10-2011 2:26 PM


Re: Evidence
To get back on Topic Tram
Would you feel any different if Louisana wasn't just including Xian creationism, it would be including Hindu, Muslim, Egyptian, Norse, etc... myths in as valid origins? I can imagine your thoughts would be quite different.
The whole idea behind separating church and state is that whose religion do you support and whose religion do you not? The founding fathers of this country were smart enough to figure out that if favor one group you insult another. So why not just make the government neutral in the matter?
I know your next response is going to be, then why do they favor evolution!? That's a religion! To which I reply it is not a religion. When you can put together a theory that doesn't rely on magic or mythical beings making things out of thin air and dust you have a leg to stand on. Otherwise we should teach that which is supported by thousands of scientists around the world. Not some hucksters who are only interested in staying in business.
Oh yeah and come down from your cross, everyone gets a bloody nose every now and then when debating. Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and move on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Tram law, posted 05-10-2011 2:26 PM Tram law has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Tram law, posted 05-11-2011 7:03 PM menes777 has replied

  
menes777
Member (Idle past 4345 days)
Posts: 36
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Joined: 01-25-2010


Message 74 of 108 (615506)
05-13-2011 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Tram law
05-11-2011 7:03 PM


Re: Evidence
Sorry Tram I sometimes don't get on this board for a few days.
I don't need any evidence to know that religion is divisive. Religion should be kept in Sunday school and the teaching of science kept in school (something we both agree on). Right now, whether most people like it or not, evolution has the science behind it. It has the facts and it has the support of the scientific community. Now whether this right or wrong, no one can deny that fact.
If you have kids and they are learning about evolution in school there is nothing stopping churches from having their own creation lessons to teach the controversy. But keep that out of the schools.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Tram law, posted 05-11-2011 7:03 PM Tram law has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024