Well, to tell you the truth, I'm not sure. It could be one, or the other. Or both of 'm. Or none of 'm.
Or both of 'm and something more. Or one of 'm and something more. Or the other one of 'm, and something more. Or none of 'm and something more. Or ... Well, the possibliities are endless. All I can say about it is: "Who am I to judge?"
Are you trying to tell us that you are so mentally retarded that you don't even know what you can remember?
That's not ture. The Matrix is a work of fiction. You are an idiot to believe it. Pick your Torah back up already.
The difference is however, that Neo' s reality did exist, somewhere else. Our reality doesn't exist at all. Our matrix is a lot deeper.
Too false. Here I am, sitting here replying to you, in the real world... in reality. It really does exist and we are here in it.
You're an idiot to believe in... wait, what am I saying? You're obviously a complete idiot. We can all see what you've written. It's pure lunacy.
I'll explain this a bit. A while ago I was having the shabbat dinner in the house of a dutch friend here in the Judean desert. He is married to a russian woman who happens to have a university degree in physics, she is an engineer in physics. After talking to my friend a bit in dutch, I explained to her in Hebrew that I just told my friend that the very solid table from which we were eating, that if we would leave the room, close the door, and then nobody would observe the table, that that table then would go out of existence.
About this her only comment was: "That is correct."
lulz, your russian friend is an idiot too. Tables do not cease to exists when people leave the room.
So reality is a bit diffferent from what you always imagined.
Given that you are too retarded to even know what you remember, why should I take your word on this? And given the lunacy of your posts, why should I even begin to think that you are not retarded?
Welcome to the Matrix!
Man, I always thought that Judaism was pretty fucking stupid, thanks for confirming it!
I think it is not so much a matter of stupid, but more ignorance from your side.
Like I said, science discovered this almost a 100 years ago. How come you don't have a clue?
Could it be that we are being lied to by the scientists, like we were lied to for more than a 100 years about the fossil record? Science telling us that the fossil record supported Darwin, while all the time they new it did not?
Could this be the skeleton in the closet of the physicists, like professor Richard Conn Henry from the Cambridge department of physics says?
No, you cannot even remember what you posted here on this forum recently. So I cannot start to think that you can even begin to remember scientific discoveries.