If our sun is second or third generation, does this not conflict with Genesis ?

Stellar evolutionary theory states the existence of multi-generations of stars. Different generations of stars states the existence of stellar evolutionary theory. Sounds circular to me.

While I will give you that stellar evolution deals with lifetime of a star, it implies multiple generations of stars. Where do you think 2nd, 3rd, etc. generation stars come from? Santa Claus?

You misunderstand my point. I'm not trying to change anything. I am, however, pointing out the implication of stellar evolution, which is that a new generation of star is born from the death of previous generation.Again, if you want to ignore this implication, then where do subsequent generations of stars come from? Santa Clause?Edit.Hence the circular argument.Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

Pretty hefty assumptions here.(1) Sol contains elements other than hydrogen and helium? Has anyone taken a sample from the sun and tested it out? Blowing hot air much these days?(2) You assume these elements didn't form in the big bang.(3) You assume there was a big bang.(4) Sol is not a first generation star, which goes back to the circular argument.(5) Sol has metalic elements. Again, anyone ever taken a sample from the sun? Seems to me like the scientific community is just blowing hot air on this one LOLCongrats on making a post containing entirely of nonsensical assumptions.Circular argument:A) There's been several generations of stars because the sun is 3rd generation.B) The sun is 3rd generation because there's been several generations (or populations) of stars.Edited by Taz, : No reason given.Edited by Taz, : No reason given.Edited by Taz, : No reason given.