homunculus writes:
Let's see, I would like to ask you to not use immature speech on a debate friendly, uncensored forum. Thanks.
Since this thread is on its way down the toilet, I might as well tell you a little about myself.
I'm a cranky person. I normally don't respond to people. When I respond, I sound cranky, because I am cranky. If I were to respond more often, you'd think that I am cranky all the time, and you would be right. It has nothing to do with you. Like the old saying goes, it's not you, it's me.
Rather, I will assert that Even though Evolutionists don't have a shred of evidence to back up their principles (which, ironically is the absence of principle), they still become frustrated (I.E. Taz) to a point of nearly giving themselves a stroke.
Ok, let's sit back for a moment and look at this. Let's assume that evolution is completely wrong. Let's assume that all "evolutionists" have recanted. How in the world does this prove a supernatural being?
Are you aware that you've just given a live demonstration of what I've been saying for years about creationists?
Rule 1 about creationism: disprove evolution ---> creation is proven by default.
I say I don't understand, when really I do. As I had said before, if I had stated on here that everything came from nothing or created itself (I.E. the big bang THEORY)
Then I would say you've been grossly misinformed and that you really really really need to seek out a cosmologist.
I said that not really expecting you to do so simply because you're a creationist, and creationists have a track record of knowing everything.
if I said that life originated from nothing or created itself (abiogenesis, or whatever name it be tagged for the season),
Then I would say you've been grossly misinformed and that you really really really need to seek out a biologist
whose discipline is abiogenesis.
But again, I really don't expect you to do so because you seem to know everything already.
But because I said we have only seen life produce life, suggesting the possibility of a god, it's like a black man walked in the middle of a kkk convention with a white girl.
You got it all wrong, so let me attempt to calmly explain this to you again.
The fact that we don't know how life began is a
gap in our knowledge. What you are doing is worshipping the
god of the gaps. I'm sure you've heard of this since you seem to know everything.
The god of the gaps exists solely in the gaps of our knowledge. As science progresses, the more gaps we fill in. This means that your god of the gaps continually loses a place to live. This is a frightened god, frightened by progress. This god will always be afraid of scientific progress, because it is human nature to continue to make scientific progress and fill in the gaps of our knowledge.
Do you really want to worship the god of the gaps? Unlike you, there are people who worship honest-to-god a god that occupies more than the gaps of our knowledge.
Does the idea of a supernatural creator really crawl on you that much?
No. What crawls on me is using the goddunit answer for everything we don't know.
Just sit back and imagine this. Imagine Kepler using the goddunit answer rather than spending years seeking out a mathematical pattern for the motions of the planets. Instead of Kepler's 3 laws of planetary motion, we'd have kepler's 3 goddunit laws of planetary motion.
Just imagine Einstein using the goddunit answer to explain Mercury's orbit. Well, goddunit.
How do people get sick? Instead of a germ theory of disease, we'd have the goddunit theory of disease.
Why do things fall down? Instead of the theory of gravity, we'd have the theory of goddunit.
Don't you see the implications of using the god of the gaps to explain the unknown?
{Back to cranky mode}