I would also like to add to what Taq had said concerning Dog Piling. It was a well thought out comment.
If this was so perhaps you could have responded with a well thought out comment of your own instead of mocking my own.
For example, " Where did Cain's wife come from if they were all related" is a very easy to understand argument. Irreducible complexity, specified complexity , and The design inference is not easy to understand, much less how humans fit into these classifications and how Creationism produces these relationships. We are asking evolutionsists to move away from something that is easy to understand to something that is, at first glance, impossible to understand. Dog piling only worsens the problem.
Actually, I tend to point to transitional fossils and genetic markers to demonstrate shared ancestry between humans and other apes. I really don't see biblical semantics as a refutation of creationism. Also, I have yet to see any creationist attempt to related ID and CSI to cladistics and the nested hierarchy of life. If anything, creationists ignore this evidence.
So even in your mocking, you failed to truly understand the issue at hand. If anything, our discussion of geology in other forums is a much better example. In those threads you have humbly noted your lack of knowledge as it relates to geology, and things have gone much better in those threads.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message by continuing in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning