The last message that was close to being on topic that I could find was by loudmouth:
http://
EvC Forum: A fatal logical flaw in creationism?
However, it seems that scientists aren't given the same respect. Instead, they are told that everything that scientists have discovered over the last 150 years is wrong. They are wrong not because of scientific reasons, but because people don't like the conclusions. This is my main source of frustration, showing evidence that is not in question to support a theory whose conclusion is disliked. I guess it would be easier to take the creationist route, start with a likeable conclusion.
I guess the moral for creationists is this. If you think evolution is wrong, then study biology and figure out where it is wrong. Studying the Bible for answers in science won't get you very far.
If you are going to show that science is wrong, it must be done on the same basis as the science used, and it must stand up to the scientific method. It must be repeatable, and all other causes of errors need to be eliminated by controlled experiments. Finally it must provide a basis for better understanding that resolves these problems.
enjoy.
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel
AAmerican
.Zen
[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}