Larni writes:
You say you are not a biologist and yet you want people to take you seriously?
I don't get why you think your armchair philosophising has any likely hood of getting any traction in biological circles when biologists on this very site are telling you your ideas and bollocks.
This line of reasoning limits this board to contributions by scientists only. Why have a debate board limited to persons of one discpline.
The reason, I a layman, cite authority for my positions is that I do not have the scientific training to reply to many scientific points.
However, I can read what other scientists say and use them as authority for my position.
It is not armchair philosphy, it is opinions based upon the knowledge of experts in the field, cited to support our opinions.