Well, good luck with that, but if you get replies such as:
(again im just amusing you, it's not scientific, so don't ask me to prove it, I can't)
I can't see things going far. We have science and religious forums here for a reason (and this is why sometimes, some posters get banded from the science side because they repeatedly fail to produce evidence).
That said, if Chuck could produce some evidence for the Holy Spirit (or even some basis for belief that it is the Holy Spirit that is the mechanism [I don't know enough about xian theology to debate that] of action it would be a very good start.
If both sides will forgive me for being a bit sheltered, am I to understand that both sides are claiming scientific support for their theories, but one side has no theories, no research done on these theories, no experiments and no groups even discussing the ideas of scientific theories to support what is arguably the most important part of the debate?
This is the problem you will see on this site over and over again.
The evidence the creationist will use is the bible and anything that does not align itself with the bible is by definition wrong.
You can demand evidence until you are blue in the face but cdesign proponentsists will default to the bible every time, if you push them hard enough.
The entire attacks on Genesis stem from a cowardly premise of not wanting to expose Christianity and Islam, two non-original replacement theologies which have zero input of these issues. Its easier to attack the Hebrew bible, right? But in not a single instance has this obsessive drive attain any success whatsoever.
What are you talking about? That has nothing to do with the topic!
To reiterate my point for the hard of thinking: you can't just say 'science prooves it' without backing it up with evidence.