Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-25-2019 10:13 PM
26 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,043 Year: 7,079/19,786 Month: 1,620/1,581 Week: 442/393 Day: 33/43 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Transitional forms in existence today
peter1985
Junior Member (Idle past 2704 days)
Posts: 4
Joined: 07-12-2011


Message 1 of 62 (623666)
07-12-2011 11:17 AM


Hi, I have been researching and internally debating the topic evolution /intelligent design for a few years now. Through this researching I've become increasingly convinced that intelligent design is a travesty based on little more than pseudo-science and rhetoric. Up till recently my biggest qualm with evolution was, as creationists put it, the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record. My second reason for doubt is the very mechanism evolution uses to function- random mutation- which as many biologists acknowledge is usually, if not always, harmful. Moreover, it's not as though our DNA itself has any awareness of the external environment around us aside from maybe sensitivity to temperature or PH. (That second reason for doubt is besides the point of my question)

I've recently researched transitional forms in the fossil record and have learned that there are in fact (contrary to what creatonists will tell you) transitional forms in the fossil record. However, if evolution is still occuring to this day, how come there are no transitional forms in existense today IE. fish with half formed limbs and such. I understand why the Australopithecines and early human ancestors went extinct, but I imagine there would be at least one living example of a clear transitional form in existence today. Any thoughts?

Edited by peter1985, : No reason given.

Edited by Admin, : Fix typo in title.


Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-12-2011 12:50 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 4 by ZenMonkey, posted 07-12-2011 12:59 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 5 by Dr Jack, posted 07-12-2011 2:34 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 6 by Coragyps, posted 07-12-2011 2:59 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 7 by Nuggin, posted 07-12-2011 3:02 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 9 by pandion, posted 07-13-2011 12:52 AM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 11 by bluegenes, posted 07-13-2011 4:07 AM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 14 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-13-2011 6:01 AM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 15 by Chuck77, posted 07-13-2011 6:25 AM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 20 by Bojan, posted 07-13-2011 9:19 AM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 23 by Taq, posted 07-13-2011 11:41 AM peter1985 has responded

    
peter1985
Junior Member (Idle past 2704 days)
Posts: 4
Joined: 07-12-2011


Message 24 of 62 (623791)
07-13-2011 1:28 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Taq
07-13-2011 11:41 AM


Very interesting. Thanks for the replies.

Before I started my research towards a conviction of the topic I decided the wisest way to do it was to approach it with an open mind and as little a bias as possible . Consequently, I read a lot of intelligent design/creationist literature, much of which I have learned over the past year is scientifically inaccurate or misconstrued science. I remember one such book had a chapter devoted to the alleged lack of transnational forms as evidence for a creator and charged that if random mutation was the mechanism for evolution there would be more species "in flux" than wholly formed species. I now see the fallacy that the subjectivity in that argument creates.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Taq, posted 07-13-2011 11:41 AM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-13-2011 2:19 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 26 by Taq, posted 07-13-2011 2:52 PM peter1985 has not yet responded
 Message 30 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-13-2011 5:32 PM peter1985 has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019