Coragyps
Member (Idle past 1034 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
Message 3 of 16 (624829)
07-20-2011 7:28 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by jar 07-19-2011 12:52 PM
|
|
That's very interesting, and a very nicely-written article for us non-biologists. This reminds me of Przewalski's Horse, which has 66 chromosomes instead of the 64 that domestic horses have. And P's horse and domestic horses are at least partially interfertile - I'll bet following the same rules that Starr describes in the article.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 1 by jar, posted 07-19-2011 12:52 PM | | jar has not replied |
|