Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8927 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-23-2019 6:57 PM
31 online now:
AZPaul3, Faith, PaulK, WookieeB (4 members, 27 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,343 Year: 15,379/19,786 Month: 2,102/3,058 Week: 476/404 Day: 80/63 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wright et al. on the Process of Mutation
Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 263 of 296 (648626)
01-17-2012 4:39 AM
Reply to: Message 262 by zi ko
01-16-2012 11:06 PM


Directed mutations.
I show you two cases of guided mutations:
1.The relative lack of intermediate fossils during periods of greate environmental changes .
2.The rapid changes in finches beaks in Galapaguos islands in respond climate changes.

You have asserted this but also have admitted that you have no evidence to support your assertion.

What conclusions are people to take from this?

I assert all the above is the result of Yahweh making thing evolove in the way Yahweh wants using psioinc enchantments. I too have no evidence to support this.

We are on an equal footing, no?


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by zi ko, posted 01-16-2012 11:06 PM zi ko has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by zi ko, posted 01-18-2012 12:06 AM Larni has responded

    
Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 270 of 296 (648735)
01-18-2012 3:26 AM
Reply to: Message 267 by zi ko
01-18-2012 12:06 AM


Re: Directed mutations.
That is not what Shapiro says and you know it. You have had that pointed out to you many times.

No one believes random mutations are the only factor in evolution. This you have been told many times.

Why do you keep ignoring what you have been told?


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by zi ko, posted 01-18-2012 12:06 AM zi ko has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 273 by zi ko, posted 01-18-2012 1:13 PM Larni has responded

    
Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 275 of 296 (648787)
01-18-2012 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 273 by zi ko
01-18-2012 1:13 PM


Re: Directed mutations.
I understand what you are saying.

It is wrong.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by zi ko, posted 01-18-2012 1:13 PM zi ko has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019