Why Creationists' Willful Ignorance?

"Truth" is subjective. It belongs in philosophy.
Science is OBJECTIVE. It deals with facts.

There are not "truths" learned in science, only facts. An individual can hold the facts to be true or untrue. It doesn't change the facts.

Again, truth is subjective. You can't really "teach" truth. You can teach ABOUT "truth", but each student will ultimately decide their own truth.

This makes truth a fairly useless subject for education.

The reason this all relates to evolution is the following:
Creationists are upset because their TRUTH disagrees with the facts. They want to replace the facts with their truth.

Creationists don't understand that their truth is irrelevant and that the facts are all education cares about.

You KEEP coming back to this as though it were a convincing argument.

You claim that the Bible is the first recording of this stuff because you claim that the Bible predates everything else.

It DOESN'T.

Cave painting CLEARLY demonstrate different animal groups and predate the Bible (and in fact the ENTIRE UNIVERSE according to your 6,000 yr calendar) but tens of thousands of years.

You need to pick an argument which hasn't been so completely destroyed so many times.

We're starting to think you might be mentally disabled in your ability to retain other people's arguments. It's almost like you don't understand that once you say something and it's shown to be wrong, it stays wrong no matter how many times you bring it up.

Except it's not. The book of Genesis doesn't even come CLOSE. The caves in France alone are easily 5x older than the oldest possible copy of Genesis. Most likely far older even than that.

Heiroglyphics are another fine example of writing about life forms prior to Genesis then. You just admitted the pyramids were older. The pyramids contain these images. Done.

False. The caves outdate the paintings often by hundreds of thousands if not millions of years. Caves take a LONG time to form. No one dates the paintings by the age of the cave - ever.

Perhaps one of the ********* things you've ever suggested, and that's saying a lot.

Only to be outdone by this gem. WTF are you talking about?!?!

Don't use words if you don't know what they mean, it makes you sound ****** or crazy.

Wow, you are on a roll and it's all down hill.

Taco Word Salad Supreme.

You need to look up "froth". It's not the same thing as "laugh".

Seriously Joseph, you need to seek medical help. You are quite possibly schitzophrenic. You are certainly suffering from some sort of brain damage, likely brought on by a series of strokes.

Your ability to reason and communicate has be severely compromised.

Seek help.

This argument that the world was in black and white prior to the Great Flood is beyond retarded.

Red ocher is and has been a staple for tribal groups going back well before the dawn of time.

The leaps and bounds you would have to go through to disprove the cave paints are so absurdly ridiculous, it is beyond even your extreme capacity for fantasy.

Seriously, you are mentally disturbed. You need PROFESSIONAL help. You are a danger to yourself and others.

This claim has already been utterly destroyed by simply directly quoting the Bible's "cures" for disease.

Killing animals does not cure your disease.

Yes, but 26,000 years ago, they weren't in color. Everything back then was black and white until India (WTF?! They worship elephant Gods!) _INVENTED_ the idea of color.

No. Population is based on availability of food. It always has been. It always will be.

A population can not exceed it's available food source for any sustained period of time. End of story.

There isn't enough food in pre-aggricultural Australia, to feed trillions, billions or even millions of people.

In the words of the immortal Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.:
"This guy is a fucking *****!"

How would you know?

Wrong on so many levels.
#1) NOT a bison. AND, ABSOLUTELY not a "domesticated" bison.
#2) No you do not need to develop agriculture to paint a picture of an animal
#3) We have PLENTY of evidence for speech prior to cave paintings, both implied through cultural context and physical remains which include the necessarily biological components.
#4) People have know how to "use color" FOREVER.
#5) Where are you getting the number "20k"? Why would someone have to have developed any one, let alone ALL, of these things 20k years prior to painting a picture of a bison.

Also extremely wrong. We have painting WORLDWIDE demonstrating a wide range of dates.

Hell, the French caves span 10,000+ years of artwork in and of themselves.

Except for "reality", but yes, if you reject reality, it's easy to dismiss evidence.

Surrounded by _salt water_ which clearly you have been drinking.

AND, you are desperately trying to change topics. "evidences at all for 60k years"??! WTF does that have to do with your claim that there should be 5 trillion Australians.

Could 5 trillion people living in Australia TODAY? Right now? Even with worldwide food production? We wouldn't have enough people over the entire rest of the world to produce and transport enough food fast enough to support that many people in Australia. And we have PLANES.

Clearly population size is limited by resources.

Until you admit that, there's really no reason for you to type anything.

As a citizen of La La Land, I reject your insulting implication that we'd ever accept someone like Joseph here.

Wait, are you saying that Soylent Green is people?

It's peeeeeeeoppppple?!?!

First off, I don't own a frog.

Second, we've been talking about it. You asked where life forms had been recorded prior to the Bible.

I pointed out cave paintings. In response, you claimed that there should be 5 trillion aboriginies. ?!?!

Then YOU brought up the fact that Egyptian heiroglyphics also demonstrate different kinds of animals and predate the bible.

Fantastic. So, between the two of us, that's 2 things which predate your claim.

So, that's that.

Horses are together. Lions are together. Fish are together. Bovines are together.

That's groupings.

Meanwhile the term species is not a "direct lift" from Genesis, no matter how much you like to pretend.

The word "species" does not appear in the Bible.

Here's a "mental prowess" exercise for you.

If you have 10 people on a boat, and there is food enough to keep 4 people alive for 1 month. How many of them will be alive after 1 year on the boat?

Alledged jews who pretend "words" represent "animals" with no actual artistic representation to prove to use what they are talking about are "VIRTUAL".

Yes, we are aware you have a make believe list. We could pretend to have a make believe list too, but we are adults.