Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9073 total)
595 online now:
jar, nwr, PaulK, Phat, Tangle, Tanypteryx (6 members, 589 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,337 Year: 4,449/6,534 Month: 663/900 Week: 187/182 Day: 20/47 Hour: 4/3

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Creationists' Willful Ignorance?
frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(1)
Message 120 of 182 (629197)
08-16-2011 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 8:10 AM


Re: "Popular" arguments
Haha so you calim that people would just indefinitively reproduce and the population level would keep growing, whitout the food resources to feed the population, whitout the medical know how to reduce plagues in the population.......

You really must be living in la la land


This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 8:10 AM IamJoseph has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by Nuggin, posted 08-16-2011 10:25 AM frako has taken no action

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 128 of 182 (629209)
08-16-2011 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 11:00 AM


Re: "Popular" arguments
I think homo sapiens is even older then that and i accept it, while you reject reality and substitute your own.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 11:00 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 6:35 PM frako has replied

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(2)
Message 131 of 182 (629249)
08-16-2011 3:45 PM


I think IamJoseph is a verry good candidate for the QQQQQ, or the the golden crockoduck.


frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 148 of 182 (629277)
08-16-2011 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 6:35 PM


Re: "Popular" arguments
What's the oldest human NAME on record?

That would be klu klu from the tu'chaka clan recorded 190 345 years ago before there was any writing, and before the hebrew god was invented.

Lol writing has not been arround quite long, so my guess is 6000 years give or take.

Homeosaps with a NAME, date, place - followed by evidencial history of a diarised calendar are thus the non-virtual kind.

Writing is a relatively new invention some 6000 years old

Um why is this relevant i could show you some cave drawings that are over 33 000 years old, they could have been "writings" of sorts like me klu klu of threadbare tribe kill big elephant yesterday.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 6:35 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 7:24 PM frako has replied

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 174 of 182 (629306)
08-16-2011 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 7:24 PM


Re: "Popular" arguments
This, like many such posts, say the non-creationists have lost all credibility, and has become akin to another radical fundamentalist religion.

Im just answering stupid with stupid.

I also anwsered your question as silly as it was 33000 years ago the first man painted what he was doing in his life it is ylso possible he painted his name we just cant see it because we donot understand the mindset he was in. The same way we needed the Rosetta stone to decipher hieroglyphics.

p.s. Unless you have found a version of the bible written in klinoform i seriously doubt Adam is the oldest name on record, and given that the oldest bible is 1600 years old, and the oldest manuscripst of the torah are some 2600 years old, the name adam does not go as fare back as you think.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 7:24 PM IamJoseph has taken no action

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 175 of 182 (629307)
08-16-2011 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 8:07 PM


Re: "Popular" arguments
oldest recording of life form groupings

WTF do you mean by this ????

try the fossil records allot of lifeforms grouped, my guess some 3 billion years ago the first lifeforms grouped, you can find groups of one cell organisms that made the limestone deposits and the best part unlike writing that is not objective the deposits objectively record lifeform groupings


This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 8:07 PM IamJoseph has taken no action

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(2)
Message 177 of 182 (629309)
08-16-2011 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 8:31 PM


Re: "Popular" arguments
and we have not seen a NAME older than 5770 Adam - why not?

Ok if you get to use aincent texts as fact so do i

Alulim he ruled for 28,800 years writings from 30th century BC or earlier

Alulim was the first king of Eridu, and the first king of Sumer, according to the Sumerian King List, presumably making him the first recorded king in the world. Enki, the god of Eridu, or his mortal son Adapa, are said to have brought civilization to Sumer at this point, or just shortly before.

This would make the first recorded name 33,800 years old trumping your Adam by a good 26 000 years happy now ???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alulim

And this hasto be true cause its written down

Edited by frako, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 8:31 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 8:53 PM frako has replied

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 179 of 182 (629314)
08-16-2011 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 8:53 PM


Re: "Popular" arguments
ok then pick anoter that is Human lol

lulim 8 sars (28,800 years) 30th century BC or earlier
Alalngar 10 sars (36,000 years)

"Then Eridug fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira."

En-men-lu-ana 12 sars (43,200 years)
En-men-gal-ana 8 sars (28,800 years)
Dumuzid, the Shepherd "the shepherd" 10 sars (36,000 years)

"Then Bad-tibira fell and the kingship was taken to Larag."

En-sipad-zid-ana 8 sars (28,800 years)

"Then Larag fell and the kingship was taken to Zimbir."

En-men-dur-ana 5 sars and 5 ners (21,000 years)

"Then Zimbir fell and the kingship was taken to Shuruppag."

Ubara-Tutu 5 sars and 1 ner (18,600 years)

all way older then Adam

or Ngushur 1200 years after ca. 2900 BC

just a bit older then Adam

Edited by frako, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 8:53 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 9:00 PM frako has replied

frako
Member
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 181 of 182 (629316)
08-16-2011 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by IamJoseph
08-16-2011 9:00 PM


Re: "Popular" arguments
Throw your hands up and admit deeat. It will make you a wiser person.

So whats wrong with

Jushur a few hunderd years older then adam

Or say Ubara-tutu roughly 3 times older then adam


This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by IamJoseph, posted 08-16-2011 9:00 PM IamJoseph has taken no action

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022