Behe on organismal evolution

Going off topic a bit -In the context of the Finding Darwin's God topic, I managed to present a series of misimpressions of Miller's position (D'oh).I think Miller keeps his theism and evolution seperate. Thus, he is not a theistic evolutionist.At message 31 of the above cited, MrHambre says:

quote:

---

I admire the way he takes great pains to distance himself from 'theistic evolutionists,' since he won't ascribe intention to the admittedly hit-or-miss history of life on earth.

---

I agree with MrHambre. I also agree with you, that Behe is a theistic evolutionist. But Behe's "theistic" part of his evolution views still seems pretty small. In my view, Behe is an evolutionist with just a tinge of creationist in him.I wonder if Behe would "ascribe intention to the admittedly hit-or-miss history of life on earth"?Moose

Does Behe push his ideas on creationists, or are creationists trying to make something out of Behe's ideas, beyond anything Behe actually says?I suspect the later.ID is termed "God of the gaps" or "God in the details". Even IF God was in the details, that still leaves a lot of evolution to be free running.Moose{Edited to change ID from "admin mode" - Moose}This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 09-16-2004 02:46 PM