Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 58 (9126 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: GenomeOfEden
Post Volume: Total: 909,659 Year: 6,540/14,231 Month: 87/368 Week: 48/93 Day: 1/10 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Ontological arguments - where's the beef?
Posts: 21581
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7

Message 5 of 74 (631888)
09-04-2011 7:27 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by cavediver
09-03-2011 4:59 PM

Hi Cavediver
My overall reaction is, "What a bunch of hooey!" Doesn't seem worthy of any attention at all, but I understand the argument, "Some of the most famous philosophers of history have seriously studied this issue, perhaps I should take a look."
What drew my interest was this:
cavediver writes:
While still a Christian, I had no need for proofs of God - faith was central to my, well, faith...So, following my Damascus Road conversion to atheism...
Why travel all the way from faith to atheism? Perhaps it's just that all the world's religions are wrong, simply because of the unavailability of decent evidence. Maybe even the concept of God or god or gods is itself wrong. But there seems insufficient evidence to conclude that there couldn't be something out there with intentional purpose, but on the scale of all of existence rather than of personal lives. Naturally this discards the possibility of a personal God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by cavediver, posted 09-03-2011 4:59 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by bluegenes, posted 09-04-2011 9:00 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 9 by cavediver, posted 09-04-2011 11:44 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023