Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9045 total)
95 online now:
PaulK (1 member, 94 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 887,082 Year: 4,728/14,102 Month: 326/707 Week: 57/197 Day: 1/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ontological arguments - where's the beef?
Taq
Member
Posts: 8488
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 7.4


Message 52 of 74 (632385)
09-07-2011 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Dawn Bertot
09-06-2011 4:31 PM


Re: my short response:
If it is not impossible of course its possible

It is also possible that the entity does not exist.

either way its very possible

Why "very"?

It is also possible that order and laws were not the product of an MGB. If this is possible in one possible world, then it is possible in all possible worlds. This means that the MGB did not produce the order and laws that we see. Wow, this argument works better than I had ever hoped . . .


This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Dawn Bertot, posted 09-06-2011 4:31 PM Dawn Bertot has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021