Ontological arguments - where's the beef?

I was standing next to the Grand Canyon the other day, wondering how I could prove it was possible to sing three verses of "Fiddler on the Roof" while standing within four meters of the Grand Canyon.
(Firstly, I realised that Fiddler On The Roof is not a song, but in fact a musical title, so I changed the task to singing "If I Were a Rich Man".)As I settled into deep thought, I started idly singing (which is my normal behaviour while thinking).
Three verses of "If I Were a Rich Man" later, I realised how I could prove if it was possible to sing three verses of "If I Were a Rich Man" while standing within four meters of the Grand Canyon.After which I settled down to eating my lunch: four bananas, three cherries and one small mango.
I was in a hurry so I finished my lunch in exactly 4 minutes and 23 seconds. It's probably best if you don't.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Larni has done a more than adequate explanation of why you are wrong.TBH: I could write the list of things that you are correct about on the back of a postage stamp using a crayon.

...and you don't even have evidence of your own predictions.

Are you claiming that Jar did not post the complete list of definitions from your link?
Because I have clicked your link and it looks like he did.