Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-25-2019 9:09 PM
26 online now:
AZPaul3, edge (2 members, 24 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,042 Year: 7,078/19,786 Month: 1,619/1,581 Week: 441/393 Day: 32/43 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Petition to get buz full access again.
Larni
Member
Posts: 3976
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 9 of 57 (632076)
09-05-2011 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Taz
09-05-2011 2:00 PM


It's not like Buzz has not had ample opportunities to post some actual evidence of hist ideas.

It now seems evident that he cannot grasp what is being asked of him.

What makes you think another go round will make things different?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Taz, posted 09-05-2011 2:00 PM Taz has not yet responded

    
Larni
Member
Posts: 3976
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 24 of 57 (632909)
09-11-2011 5:08 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Butterflytyrant
09-07-2011 10:46 AM


What do the lurkers say?
Jar mentioned the non member readers. At this moment there are 193 visitors here. It would be a sad waste of those readers time if they were reading one of the posts I have been involved in where I am trying to explain what the word 'nature' means to IMJ or the word 'communicate' to DB.

I would be interested for hear what the lurkers think about this matter. My own opinion is that Buzz won't really modify his approach so why bother: however, as you say a thread with him in it could be valuable to the lurkers.

Lurkers: what say you?


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Butterflytyrant, posted 09-07-2011 10:46 AM Butterflytyrant has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by nwr, posted 09-11-2011 11:12 AM Larni has not yet responded
 Message 32 by Aware Wolf, posted 09-12-2011 1:31 PM Larni has responded
 Message 33 by rueh, posted 09-12-2011 2:18 PM Larni has not yet responded

    
Larni
Member
Posts: 3976
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 34 of 57 (633113)
09-12-2011 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Aware Wolf
09-12-2011 1:31 PM


Re: What do the lurkers say?
I do the same thing with ICANT.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Aware Wolf, posted 09-12-2011 1:31 PM Aware Wolf has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019