Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-25-2019 9:39 PM
20 online now:
JonF, xongsmith (2 members, 18 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,042 Year: 7,078/19,786 Month: 1,619/1,581 Week: 441/393 Day: 32/43 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Petition to get buz full access again.
Inactive Member

Message 37 of 57 (633171)
09-12-2011 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Adminnemooseus
09-12-2011 8:08 PM

Re: I favor letting Buz do "Great Debates"
Ah, I think that's a good compromise - that would allow people to participate with Buz on the subjects they think he's capable of addressing, without allowing Buz-style nonsense to spill over into other threads.

You can close the board down, now - Moose and I agreed on something.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-12-2011 8:08 PM Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Buzsaw, posted 09-12-2011 10:13 PM crashfrog has responded

Inactive Member

Message 40 of 57 (633174)
09-12-2011 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Buzsaw
09-12-2011 10:13 PM

Re: I favor letting Buz do "Great Debates"
but some of us peon creationists see your stuff as nonsense, spilling into the threads.

It's too bad you've never been able to refute it, then.

The majority of Americans are theistic, including no small number of scientists.

Yes, but, to be fair, the majority of Americans are also total morons. And I doubt you'd recognize the "theism" of most "theistic" scientists as anything but Spinoza-style near-atheism. For the most part they'd make Jar look like the Pope.

Edited by crashfrog, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Buzsaw, posted 09-12-2011 10:13 PM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 09-12-2011 10:54 PM crashfrog has not yet responded

Inactive Member

Message 46 of 57 (633590)
09-14-2011 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Buzsaw
09-12-2011 11:10 PM

Re: What do the lurkers say?
I prefer corroborating evidences, so as to lend the maximum support to any given hypothesis.

Your thoughts on when evidence was corroborating, and more importantly when evidence is credible, would make for a very interesting thread, don't you think?

I think many of us suspect that you're not clear on these concepts. Certainly many of your ideological fellows have said as much, so it can't all be bias on our part. Perhaps this is something you'd like to explore at some point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 09-12-2011 11:10 PM Buzsaw has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019