Ah, I think that's a good compromise - that would allow people to participate with Buz on the subjects they think he's capable of addressing, without allowing Buz-style nonsense to spill over into other threads.
You can close the board down, now - Moose and I agreed on something.
but some of us peon creationists see your stuff as nonsense, spilling into the threads.
It's too bad you've never been able to refute it, then.
The majority of Americans are theistic, including no small number of scientists.
Yes, but, to be fair, the majority of Americans are also total morons. And I doubt you'd recognize the "theism" of most "theistic" scientists as anything but Spinoza-style near-atheism. For the most part they'd make Jar look like the Pope.
I prefer corroborating evidences, so as to lend the maximum support to any given hypothesis.
Your thoughts on when evidence was corroborating, and more importantly when evidence is credible, would make for a very interesting thread, don't you think?
I think many of us suspect that you're not clear on these concepts. Certainly many of your ideological fellows have said as much, so it can't all be bias on our part. Perhaps this is something you'd like to explore at some point.